Sheriff Arpaio; Settling Obama’s Birth Certificate Problem Once and For All

By DiMarkco Chandler:

Don’t get suckered into the “Birther” just because Sheriff Arpaio’s investigators present evidence that appears compelling and logical. Everything is not always what it appears to be!

Though the “birther” movement is fringe, no matter what you think of Sheriff Arpaio, he posse has presented some interesting discrepancies or at least questions about the birth certificate that Obama released in April of 2011. “This document is fictitious” said Mike Zullo, the chief investigator with the Arizona sheriff’s volunteer posse. On Tuesday, July 17, 2012, Obama’s birth certificate was the topic of interest at a press conference in Maricopa County, Arizona. “It’s time for the charade to stop,” Zullo pleaded.

Sheriff Arpaio followed Zullo, stating, “We’d like to give it to somebody… I would like the congress to have hearings, maybe a special prosecutor, not only for this issue but at issue, how easy it is to get a birth certificate in Hawaii. When we’re talking about national security, talking about immigration, we are not accusing the President of any crime. We are strictly investigating a possible government forged document.”

It appears that Arpaio is bent on proving that the President’s birth certificate is a fake. Zullo says that numeric codes on certain parts indicate that the parts were left empty when in actuality they were supposed to be filled out. Zullo also claims that a 95-year-old former state employee who says he signed the birth certificate has explained the codes. In addition, investigators have found a writer who is publishing a book about Obama’s birth certificate and plans on assisting the posse with their investigation.

What Arpaio and “birthers” are looking for is to prove Obama was born in Kenya and not the USA.

Though officials in Hawaii have confirmed Obama’s citizenship, Sheriff Arpaio refuses to accept their claims.

Perhaps one reason why Arpaio insist that the document is a fake lies in what the sheriff has discovered on the face of the certificate. At issue is the fact that on the certificate, it asks for the race of the father, the document indicates that someone wrote the word African. The problem is that the term “African” was not used as an identifier until 1989, 28 years after Obama was born. The box is also coded with a 9, indicating by code that no information was provided. In other words, the number 9 means that the question was left blank.

In addition, after an interview with Verna K.L. Lee, the clerk who signed Obama’s long-form certificate, investigators arguably learned that Kapioloni Medical Center, Obama’s place of birth, had assigned him a number that was higher than a pair of twins whose records indicate that their birth actually followed the president’s. Thus, Arpaio is suggesting that either the hospital made an error or the president was not born there.

Well, as I said earlier, things are not what they always appear to be. Let’s take the Arpaio’s first piece of evidence.  It proposes that since the term African or African American was not used until the 1980’s and official government agencies did not require the term until 1987 that because the term is written on Obama’s birth certificate to indicate his father’s race that it represents mounting that the document is fake.

Here is why Arpaio discovery is flimsy at best: His father, Barack Obama Sr. was born in Kanyadhiang Village, Kenya. Where is Kenya? That is right, Africa. What was the question on the birth certificate? What race is the father? Answer: African.

Arpaio’s second piece of evidence ask why does Obama’s birth certificate have sequential numbers chronologically higher than the birth certificate sequence numbers found on the twins certificate, who incidentally were born following his birth. I think this argument is simple to explain. The hospital either made a mistake or though he was born first they processed the twins before he was processed.

Clearly, if this evidence is the best proof Arpaio has to support the claim that Obama’s certificate of birth is fake, I’m afraid for all the people he has put in jail as a result of evidence he has collected to determine their guilt.

How incompetent can one be.

22 Responses to "Sheriff Arpaio; Settling Obama’s Birth Certificate Problem Once and For All"

  1. H Bounel   January 21, 2013 at 6:26 am

    The odd thing here is Sheriff Arpaio made this anouncement on July 17, 2012. Since July 19, not a peep has been heard from this very noisy Sheriff. Why? Did they find something that caused them to drop the case? If so, why not another press conference. OR, did Obama send his thugs, FBI, CIA, NSA, ICE, Secret Service or any of his other storm troopers to have a talk with Sheriff Arpaio, to convince him that he, his wife and kids, his grand kids, would be much safer if he dropped this whole thing like a rock. This would result in Sheriff Arpaio to shut the hell up. Guess what? Not a peep about this case from the Sheriff. If the govt wants you to shut the hell up, they have there ways of doing that.

    Reply
  2. Barbara Samuelson   July 28, 2012 at 2:31 am

    I have looked at the entire presentation. Even the Secret Service stuff. I have to say that there is much more than that shone to be wrong with both papers. YOU are the incompetent fool! Answer me this…. how brainwashed must one be to ignore accurate evidence? What is the connection you people have to this brainwashing Liberal/Socialist governmental body? Grow a pair and be open minded enough to accept that Obama is NOT the Messiah!!!!

    Reply
  3. Concerned   July 24, 2012 at 11:05 pm

    Ever been to Hawaii? Locals there are pretty incompetent. Would not put it past them to mess up a birth certificate. But most locals hate blacks worse than whites, so I’m sure they would have put black instead of African, especially in the time frame the president was born. Shoots brah!

    Reply
  4. Phill   July 24, 2012 at 9:56 am

    If you will research it for yourself you will find the biggest mistake on his forged certificate is the fact that that hospital didn’t exist by that name until years later after it merged with another hospital.

    Reply
    • Hugh Lander   July 25, 2012 at 9:09 pm

      Then why do the Nordyke twin’s certificates, which you Birthers love to discuss, list the SAM HOSPITAL? Are they forged too?

      Reply
      • Hugh Lander   July 25, 2012 at 9:10 pm

        Sorry, “SAME” HOSPITAL

        Reply
  5. Ralph   July 23, 2012 at 2:51 am

    “African” is not a race. In the US’s segregated past, dark skinned Americans were defined as “coloured” or ‘black”.

    You have to wonder why there are no medical charts, bills or accounting records to indicate payment for hospital services.

    Reply
    • guardian   July 23, 2012 at 3:13 am

      A person born on the African Continent as Obama’s father was, often referred to themselves in terms of race as an African.

      Reply
  6. Chris Ryan   July 22, 2012 at 11:35 pm

    The birth certificate doesn’t ask nationality, it says “Race of Father.”. Did you even look at the birth certificate before writing this ridiculous article?

    Reply
    • guardian   July 22, 2012 at 11:53 pm

      Are you kidding me. I put race everywhere in the article. Get a life

      Reply
  7. winstoncourt   July 22, 2012 at 7:51 am

    There is no question here, obamas’ birth certificate is a fraud, anyone with computer skills can download a copy of it off the whitehouse website, then a free copy of adobe illustrator, then the details on the forgery, and prove it to themselves and anyone they can show it to … a criminal is in the whitehouse — just as Joe Arpaio and his posse is saying.

    We have no valid president, we have no valid senate, we have no valid house, we have no valid courts … the crimes and extent of the debauchery and treason has been exposed … so why do fools go on arguing the facts? Is it because the government schools have been so successful at brain washing? Has something been put in the food supply? Is it drugs?

    Who the heck knows … but it is as spooky as spooky can get!

    Reply
    • Mark   July 23, 2012 at 3:51 am

      A paradox, a republican woman? Is like a gay republican… Don’t belief all what those prophets of Satan say. If hell exist, hitler will welcome all those full of hate republican, they pour just bitterness when they speak, I am sure those family values means leaving alone and hated by their children and society

      Reply
  8. Hannah   July 22, 2012 at 1:28 pm

    This isn’t races . Read our constitution in Oder to be a president you must be born in the USA . Ppl forget everyone is forgetting! Out consitition

    Reply
    • mrk   July 23, 2012 at 6:49 pm

      you need to read the constitution. Nowhere does it say you have to be born in the US to be President. It says you must be a “natural born citizen.” The definition of THAT phrase is hotly debated. If you were born by C-section, are you a “natural born citizen” able to run for President? SO anyways, read the constitution yourself. It’s a great document.

      Reply
      • Brandon Rhoades   July 27, 2012 at 5:18 am

        Obama would violate this clause as well as Marco Rubio, if he were to be VP.
        In 1875, the U.S. Courts found in the case of Minor vs. Happersett –

        “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.”

        Reply
        • Brandon Rhoades   July 27, 2012 at 5:24 am

          *Obama (remove “would”) violates this clause*

          Reply
      • hovonapilgrim   November 14, 2012 at 4:01 pm

        MRK – I have read a lot of comments over the years, but your comment is without a doubt the stupidest thing I have ever read. You need to close your eyes and thank God that you live in this country because if you lived else where you’d be in a rubber room.

        Reply
  9. Andrew Corsi   July 22, 2012 at 6:28 am

    African, Kenya, Jewish, Muslim, Jeremiah Wright’s choir boy, whatever!!
    Let’s not try to bury the REAL question!
    If that long awaited long form birth certificate is a forged fake, where was Obama REALLY born??
    That is the question! If he was not born here, we can now understand why he paid over one million dollars to keep that birth certificate hidden for two years!
    Attempting to obfuscate and redirect is not the answer; that’s just a trick to divert.
    Is Obama a foreigner and therefore not eligible to be the president?!

    Reply
  10. michael shiva   July 22, 2012 at 5:59 am

    All true about the nationality but seems the question is about RACE not nationality. Race cannot be Kenyan!
    “… At issue is the fact that on the certificate, it asks for the race of the father,…”

    Reply
  11. brian   July 22, 2012 at 1:32 am

    Yes. a russian person who is born in russia is considered russian…..not asian. even though russia is in asia. russia is the nation asia is the continent.

    Reply
  12. ATPM   July 22, 2012 at 12:10 am

    African is close enough for an american ! Ask Sarah

    Reply
  13. rogeroger   July 21, 2012 at 11:42 pm

    ” What nationality is the father? Answer: African”
    I thought Africa was a continent. Kenya is a nation.
    .

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.