Boehner and McConnell need to join Warren Buffett and Steve Forbes

Times Were Good Then

By James Turnage:

What President Obama wants is for the country to return to the tax policies of Bill Clinton. Warren Buffett and even Steve Forbes agree. Our country was prosperous, and the middle class was employed and had a hopeful outlook for the future. When Clinton left office we had no national debt, in fact Bush inherited a surplus. The argument by Republicans that raising taxes on the so called “job creators” will increase unemployment is preposterous. Paying your fair share of money you made because you live in a free economy seems to me like the right thing to do.

Following Bush’s failed “trickle down” policies and removing accountability from large corporations will take us farther down the wrong path. His tax cuts for the wealthy were the beginnings of our economic downturn.

The G.O.P. has to change in numerous ways. Continually insisting on legislature and policy which benefit only the very wealthy would be a good place to start. I personally believe that at least 60% of our tax dollars should be in the form of repayment to our country’s citizens. If all I paid taxes for in my 47 years of working was to increase defense spending or to have my tax dollars leave the country in the form of foreign aid, (including some of our enemies), then what we really need to think about is eliminating income tax entirely. We should go back to our country’s beginnings and pay taxes only to our states.

The political right was damaged badly in the election, and some are wise enough to see that they must represent all of the American people and move more to the center and away from the far right. Boehner and McConnell need to join that group. For four years Mr. Obama fought an obstructionist House of Representatives. Mr. Speaker and Mr. Minority Leader, I suggest you look carefully into the future. Obviously the voting public saw something in their crystal balls.

2 Responses to "Boehner and McConnell need to join Warren Buffett and Steve Forbes"

  1. J Lowell   November 29, 2012 at 12:06 pm

    Writer says: “When Clinton left office we had no national debt, in fact Bush inherited a surplus.”

    I think (hope) the writer means: “no budget deficit” rather than “no national dept”. Bush should have used the budget surplus to start paying down the national dept instead of giving tax breaks at the same time as going to war. Why can’t people understand the difference between “budget deficit” and “national dept”?

    Reply
  2. Benjamin Gaul   November 28, 2012 at 11:58 am

    How about we return to another economic aspect of the Clinton years, while we’re going back to those tax rates: Government Spending levels.

    Why do you guys on the Left always “conveniently” forget that Clinton had Republicans running both the House AND the Senate, for the last 6 years of his Presidency?

    Oh, and there were Annual BUDGETS written and passed, under Republican majorities.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.