Lower tax on carbon dioxide emissions, coal or oil producers, power plants and other sources have little traction in U.S congress, although some liberal lawmakers have recently pitched new proposals.
The EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) agrees with the Barack Obama proposition that “the countries that lead the 21st century clean energy economy will be the countries that lead the 21st century global economy,” but what’s poverty and health have in common with this speech?
Ironically, everything. The objective with this subliminal campaign is discussing with the U.S citizens what will be the compensation for the 2008 crisis.
The ozone pollution is out of question because scientists aren’t sure about this phenomenon and the health risks for the human being. The only reason to stop the global warming theory is the existence of a rational motivation to punish countries and people with disagree practices, in form of currency taxes in acceptance of a minority group of international banks that advocates with a possible exclusion of the poor countries.
That will pay for the new stage in development countries industrialization without any guarantees that its economy will be increased with more investments in education, health and food.
Infrastructure is an important sector that don’t be positioned about the global warming fellowship because is one of the sectors that contributes for the most pollution in the world. The solid and liquid wastes released by heavy construction are highly toxic and in contact with the environment can do serious damage to earth ecosystem.
Why the U.S government don’t make a more seriously discussion about the heavy construction business in the new clean energy economy?
Written By: Tiago Silveira