Kourtney Kardashian Maury Moment Marred By Model Claim of Fraud

Kourtney Kardashian Maury Moment Marred by Male Model

Kourtney Kardashian has gotten proof positive that son Mason was fathered by Scott Disick and not by male model Michael Girgenti. Just like an episode of Maury, she got the DNA results that proved her case once and for all, only to have it marred by Michael Girgenti to claim fraud at the finding.

Girgenti has been saying that he is three year-old Mason’s father after he and Kardashian had unprotected sex in 2009. Despite the fact that Kourtney and boyfriend Scott Disick have been together for seven years.

Kardashian’s lawyers have said from the start that Girgenti was spreading malicious lies about the parentage of Mason. Kourtney herself said in a statement on Thursday that, “After three-and-a-half years of rumors and lies being spread by an individual I met briefly at a photo shoot, I am setting the record straight that Scott is Mason’s father. While it saddens me to have to address these ridiculous lies — especially when the truth was never in doubt — this story must be put to rest.”

Kourtney Kardashian hasn’t been able to savour her moment of victory too much though. Her Maury moment was marred by the male model still claiming that the results were fraudulent. Apparently because they did not show what he expected.

TMZ brought the story to the public’s attention when Girgenti filed legal papers stating the he was actually Mason’s biological father and not Disick. Citing his sexual adventure with Kourtney and the fact that Mason did not look like his sister or Disick.

The male model met Kardashian in back in 2008 at a photo shoot. After their sexual encounter in 2009, Mason was born nine months later. Girgenti did the math and decided he was the father. He also began telling everyone in the media who would listen about who Mason’s father really was.

When the model attempted to contact 34 year-old reality television personality and when she refused to respond he then filed the necessary legal papers with the Los Angeles County Superior Court requesting a paternity test and joint custody of little Mason.

But the results that came back told a different story from Girgenti’s and the Kardashian camp are celebrating their victory. Kourtney’s lawyer, Todd Wilson, spoke to TMZ after the result and said, “His claims are absurd and this is simply another shameful attempt to gain publicity and profit from fictional stories about my client.”

While Kourtney was obviously pleased about the court-monitored DNA test result, apparently, Girgenti just shifted gears in his claim of being Mason’s biological father. He is now claiming the independent test results are fake.

Despite results that clearly show that Scott Disick is Mason’s biological father and not Girgenti, he is now saying that he will not be happy until a court-monitored DNA test is done. The court hearing has been scheduled for September.

It is extremely doubtful that Girgenti will be pleased with any results that do not back up his claim of parentage. It has clearly gone past the stage of reality and now seems to be bordering on obsession. Kourtney Kardashian may have had a Maury moment, sans the dramatic television reveal, but the male model, who seems determined that he will be declared Mason’s real father, will most likely continue to claim fraud.

By Michael Smith
United Kingdom

Source

Source 1

One Response to "Kourtney Kardashian Maury Moment Marred By Model Claim of Fraud"

  1. George Louis   August 18, 2013 at 12:48 am

    I read Labcorp website PDF it says right there in black and white that Paternity tests are submitted either by the buyer or a physician of your choice. There is no charge if collected by a Labcorp facility. Seeing how they DIDN”T go to a Labcorp near them in L.A. instead kourtney opted to submit the swabs to a Labcorp in North Carolina. They did the swabs unmonitored which means they could have altered results by using Penelope DNA and Scott’s the lab would never know who is who. Believe me they would do this their brand is everything to them. And that is why the court will not uphold their test. It needs to be the court ordered test. What scam artists.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.