Giant Human Skeletons Discovered in Wisconsin?

Giant Human Skeletons Discovered in Wisconsin?

It is unknown why scientists have remained silent about the discovery of 18 giant human skeletons which were found in burial grounds in the state of Wisconsin back in May of 1912. They were in mounds next to Lake Delavan, Wisconsin. The excavation site was supervised by Beloit College. The allegedly massive size of the skeletons and lengthened skulls did not fit into any scientific concept that was in textbooks of the day. They were massive and not believed to be any type of normal human beings.

These alleged findings were first reported on May 4, 1912. It stated that these skeletons had heights which ranged from 7.6 feet up to 10 feet and the skulls were much bigger than the heads of any type of person who lived inside America today. The story also said the skulls had double rows of teeth, six toes on each foot and six fingers on each hand. It was also reported that these bones were believed to belong to beings that could have even been aliens.

Since that time, there have been at least 200 digs that claims other “giants” have been discovered. However, such finds have failed to make the news since around the 1950’s for the most part. It seems that the majority of people just do not believe in this type of thing, because it sounds like complete nonsense. However photographs have been taken to record the finds as the picture with this article shows.

In 2002, National Geographic did a report on 12 skeletons that were supposedly discovered in Greece. They were measured at heights between 12 to 15 feet tall. Was this as well as the find in Wisconsin some kind of joke? People trying to get attention for the press? The truth is no one knows the answer. The find in Wisconsin was only one of many dozens of finds that have been reported in national and local newspapers from all the way back in 1850 moving forward to today. Those were not even the first set of skeleton giants discovered in Wisconsin.

In August of 1891, it was reported that scientists from the Smithsonian Institution had found numerous pyramids shaped burial mounds near Madison, Wisconsin. The excavators discovered an elaborate old time fort which they called Aztalan. Around it, they discovered the skeleton of a man who was called a “giant”. The bones were said to allegedly measure over nine feet long and were well preserved.

There have also been enormous size skeletons and skulls of a race of giants which have been discovered on a very steady basis all over the Midwestern states for over 100 years. The huge skeletons have been discovered in Iowa, Indiana, Minnesota, Ohio, Illinois, New York and Kentucky.

If scientists from the Smithsonian Institution actually found giant size skeletons, why are they not on display?  Some conspiracy theorists say that Smithsonian Institution has been actually accused of making an effort to keep the giant skeletons their scientists found locked away somewhere. They say that today’s archaeology and anthropology want to seal the door on the true past, stopping any interpretation of the North American past as bereft of anything unusual.

When looking for actual scientific knowledge over this subject, there is basically nothing on the subject that is discussed. On the day that a scientist debates a creationist at a museum, it would be interesting to know what the scientific side to this story is. Updates will follow if and when found. It is unknown why scientists have continued to remain silent about the discovery of giant human skeletons.

By Kimberly Ruble


Unexplained Mysteries

Biblio Tecapleyades

Red Ice News


71 Responses to Giant Human Skeletons Discovered in Wisconsin?

  1. Silent Watcher August 27, 2014 at 10:10 am

    you sh*thead, are seeing darker coloured dirth, the only shadow projected that can really be seen is the beneath the hip on left. If you are reffering to why ‘THAT’ shadow is going to the left or so, it’s the uncertain depths of the ground, and the slope therefor pulls the shadow. I know what ;I’ know, and see what ‘I see.

    • Silent Watcher August 27, 2014 at 10:15 am

      Make one of those pictures, and send me. I want proof of the false proof being false.

      • stegokitty August 29, 2014 at 11:37 am

        There really isn’t a way for me to send you one of the “pictures” since I don’t have your email address, and the webmaster here keeps removing the images and any reference to them. If you’re willing to post your email address then I’ll send it to you. Or just go to YouTube, and look up my account (stegokitty) and you can contact me there, and I can show you all of the images you want.

  2. Rocky Grove August 21, 2014 at 10:07 am

    legend’s of the anunnaki people fit this perfectly. Also known as the Sumerian Gods said to make the humans on earth by mixing there da with neanderthals use man as slaves they left and gave us the planet after they was done with the mineing

  3. innocent Shongwe. aka zainto August 7, 2014 at 7:21 am

    Genesis 6:
    1 When people had spread all over the world, and daughters were being born, 2 some of the heavenly beings saw that these young women were beautiful, so they took the ones they liked. 3 Then the LORD said, “I will not allow people to live forever; they are mortal. From now on they will live no longer than 120 years.”

    4 In those days, and even later, there were giants on the earth who were descendants of human women and the heavenly beings. They were the great heroes and famous men of long ago.
    ……….. The giant discovered skeletons belongs to the offspring which were the result from this heavenly being. This is the fact. Scientists know this but they are ignorant to know the truth.

    • nepawoods August 7, 2014 at 8:26 am

      No such skeletons were found. Nor has evidence been found that the bible’s account of giants is anything but fiction.

  4. John Hunter August 2, 2014 at 10:07 am

    Why does the Mans shadow go to the left, and the skeletons shadow to the right?

    • Beaumagi August 20, 2014 at 1:22 pm

      If you look closely at the angle of the shadows of both man and skeleton in relation to the angle at which the picture is taken and then consider the angles of Geometry you would realize that the shadows are all congruent or EXTREMELY close. Notice the shadows under the bones are congruent to the trajectory of the man’s shadow in relation to the angle of the camera. If this were an overlay as you are proposing and the sun was more behind or even just above the skeleton the shadows thereof would be much farther forward in relations to the man’s. I propose this MAY be authentic but am no expert on the matter. So each may come to their own conclusion. This is just my thoughts though.

      • nepawoods August 21, 2014 at 6:57 am

        The shadows should be in the same direction and equally proportional to the height of the object casting them, regardless of camera angle. They are not even close.

        More to the point, it would’ve been easy for someone to photoshop this and get the shadows right. Therefore, it can’t be taken as evidence, regardless of the shadows. To quote Carl Sagan, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Pics on the Internet that may have been photoshopped are not extraordinary evidence.

      • nepawoods August 21, 2014 at 7:01 am

        “I’ve made a good number of these fake images for laughs.
        Whomever made this one wasn’t paying attention.”

        But whoever made this one is probably still laughing.

      • Carsten Philip Vedvik August 22, 2014 at 3:39 am

        The man is standing on his feet, while the skeleton is lying on the ground and in a completely different position. I am sorry, but you are totally wrong!

        • nepawoods August 22, 2014 at 11:47 am

          No, you are wrong. The shadows should still project in the same direction.

  5. Mikael Toldam July 24, 2014 at 9:26 pm

    There is – of course, only one explanation, why scientists is silent about this – and that is, that the findings confirms the bible (Genesis 1:6-4), and does not correspond with Darwins teaching of evolution.

    • nepawoods July 25, 2014 at 6:36 am

      Sarcasm? I mean, there’s the obvious other explanation: There were no such findings. It’s all a hoax.

    • stegokitty August 17, 2014 at 7:07 am

      Only one explanation? How about this one: It’s fake. And it is. And I say this as a proponent of a 6-day creation.

  6. Pål Kristian Vaag July 20, 2014 at 3:35 pm

    This does not proves god. This tells somethings about visitors from Space. Somebody likes to hide the truth about Ufo`s and Things like this. I dont trust the scientsts to day anymore. Sorry

    • nepawoods July 20, 2014 at 5:25 pm

      What evidence do you have of anything being hidden? We know there are hoaxes (such as the picture above) about giants. Do we have legitimate evidence they existed?

      • Carsten P. Vedvik August 22, 2014 at 3:55 am

        Yes! There are many giant constructions all over the globe, some of them with large stones weighing over 900 tons. So skeletons are not needed to prove that the giants excisted. Different people all over the world have histories of these giants and have also made sculptures of them. The native american people tells about giants which they fought against. Egyptians have hieroglyphs of their own people together with giants. That explains the pyramides! People all over the world also tell about a flood. In South America, it has been found several thousand year old sculptures of dinosaurs, perfect in their shape, which is a clear evidence that man and dinosaurs lived together.

        • nepawoods August 22, 2014 at 11:53 am


          How big were these giants that they could move 900 ton stones so much easier than humans?

          • stegokitty August 22, 2014 at 1:41 pm

            How interesting, that all of my comments which contain information showing that the image in the OP is a fake have been removed. So who is it that’s engaging in conspiracy here?

          • Carsten P. Vedvik August 22, 2014 at 3:26 pm

            It’s possible these giants had various types of techniques to lift different types of boulders, but at least it’s pretty obvious that they were superior human race in bodily strength. The biggest skeletons ever observed is said to be at around 36′ feet! Then you can just imagine how it was possible to move boulders weighing several hundred tons! Modern engineers admit that we do not have the technology to move these massive blocks even today! So the giant structures speak pretty well for themselves! Evolutionists will not talk about it and I have no trouble understanding! These aforementioned evidence and several with them, is crushing the ridiculous and idiotic Darwin theory to peaces!

          • stegokitty August 23, 2014 at 8:59 pm

            “The biggest skeletons ever observed is said to be at around 36′ feet! ”

            Where is the evidence for this observation?

          • nepawoods August 24, 2014 at 8:46 am

            36 feet? That would make them 6 times as tall, 36 times as strong, but 216 times as heavy. In other words, they’d have 1/6 th of our strength to weight ratio, and would have a hard time just getting out of bed.

Your Thoughts?

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.