Tesla Model S Sees Its First Fatality

tesla

Over the recent holiday weekend, a highly coveted Tesla Model S was stolen and crashed in a fiery explosion. The electric cars, created by Elon Musk, have been receiving attention since their first prototype. As more of these cars hit the road there have been increasing questions about their safety. As the Tesla Model S Sees its first fatality these questions arise once again.

The stolen Tesla reportedly crashed into a synagogue at an incredibly high speed. It immediately split in half and caught fire, which was the main concern for the electric cars. As they run on a battery and not gasoline, the risk of fire was always thought to be a big factor. Musk has said that the odds of the battery catching fire is around 1 in 8,000 vehicles which is five times lower than the risk with a gasoline car. Regardless of the facts and numbers, the Tesla still seemed an unsafe investment for people. In response to these doubts Musk added a full titanium shield for the battery to further decrease the risk. Unfortunately, in this incident, because the car split in half, the titanium shield tore in half and exposed the battery to the intense heat of the crash. That’s when the explosion occurred and the Tesla Model S saw its first fatality.

The suspect of the theft was a 26-year-old from Inglewood California named Joshua Michael Flot. During the high speed crash he was engaged in with the police after the robbery, he was flung out of the car and sustained multiple critical injuries. He was still alive when police arrived at the scene of the crime but he later succumbed to his injuries and has since passed away. Police reports say that Flot lost control of the vehicle during the high speed chase which led to the fatal accident. The vehicle reportedly reached dangerous speeds of 100 mph and over. While any vehicle is unsafe at such speeds, Tesla has issued a statement saying they are saddened by this accident and are willing to help the authorities in any way.

Thee Investigation is still underway as more information about the crash becomes available. Once done, it will be determined if Tesla is liable and if so, how much and how so. Musk is not worried about the stock of the company or the possible media backlash. Instead Tesla’s statements are focused on Flot and what a horrible loss this first fatality is.

This is the first reported fatality from a Tesla Model S crash. Only two Tesla vehicles have ever been reported to have crashed and caught fire. In the first, it was a mistake on the part of the driver and nobody was hurt. Unfortunately in this case, this was a deadly explosion. When police arrived on the scene the wreckage was so bad that they immediately deemed the accident non-survivable. Although best efforts were made to rescue Flot and stabilize his critical injuries, it has unfortunately been since ruled as a fatal accident.

Elon Musk, owner of the company, is steering all media attention away from Tesla and focusing on this tragic loss. This is not the time to question the integrity of the company or electric cars, Musk says, but instead to grieve this awful loss sustained by Flot’s family and the community at large. Although this is the first fatality seen for the Tesla Model S, stock prices and market values have yet to be affected.

By Sindhu Reddy

Sources:
Autoblog Green
Columbia Daily Herald
Ubergizmo

14 Responses to "Tesla Model S Sees Its First Fatality"

  1. todd   July 14, 2014 at 11:58 am

    So, an idiot steals a car, then crashes it into a wall, he dies… I have lost much respect for elon musk for his apology to family of a car theif. He chose to steal the car, he chose to run from police… This is not teslas fault, this is not a time to apologize for someone’s ignorance, and this is not the time to protect the ignorant. This is similar to the family of a robber asking for more gin control because the person they tried to rob shot them in self defense.

    Reply
  2. Alex   July 13, 2014 at 7:35 pm

    The article is poorly written and the “journalist” clearly did not do there research. Also how is anyone to know if it is a direct quote when it is not even in quotations? plus the sites were never properly cited in the article so no one is to know what information he got from where.

    Reply
  3. Mn   July 13, 2014 at 7:17 pm

    If he was thrown from the car how was he killed by the fire?

    Reply
  4. Koenigseff   July 13, 2014 at 4:02 pm

    Nope. He got ejected through the windshield because he wasn’t wearing a seatbelt and was still alive after. He died in the hospital. He did not die in the Tesla. Streak is still going. No deaths in a Tesla. Safest car ever made.

    Reply
  5. custom1   July 13, 2014 at 10:33 am

    Exodus 20:15.Though shall not steal.

    Reply
  6. Pablo   July 13, 2014 at 9:38 am

    Typical stupid, mislead article. Seems like the only purpose of this article is to call people’s attention.
    “As more of these cars hit the road there have been increasing questions about their safety.” Increasing questions among who, the ignorant? 5.4 stars, thanks. Do your research, Sindhu.

    Reply
  7. David St. Hubbins   July 12, 2014 at 8:18 pm

    Amazingly stupid article. Please show me someone who survived a 100+ mph crash in another car, or tank for that matter. And he was thrown from the car, as you said, so now tell me about people who get launched from cars at speeds like that and survive impact. By the way, how do you know if this car had the titanium plate upgrade?

    Reply
  8. Mark   July 12, 2014 at 5:29 pm

    Typical media hype

    Reply
  9. Alan Dean Foster   July 12, 2014 at 2:10 pm

    Lessee…guy hits several cars, smashes into a steel street light pole at around 100mph, is not a wearing a seat belt, gets thrown out of the car, and still lives for three days.

    Definitely a dangerous vehicle. Not nearly as dangerous as crappy, poorly researched “journalism”, however.

    Reply
  10. johnnysmith   July 12, 2014 at 2:09 pm

    no way this is a real post! It is like the total opposite of fact reporting.

    Reply
  11. Alex   July 12, 2014 at 7:47 am

    I am so glad to see the contents are sane, because this article is really stupid. “This was a deadly explosion”, what is this guy smoking? The guy died from blunt force trauma, and there wasn’t even an explosion. Just as much as snap rocks are explosions. Wow, find a new career guy.

    Reply
  12. Thomas Mayer   July 12, 2014 at 6:13 am

    So the guy dies from injuries sustained from getting FLUNG out of the vehicle and lodged between the end part of the car and the side of a building and it is the fact that it is an electric car, that is the issue? Don’t be a moron. Look at the photo! Do you see a horribly burnt out wreck?

    Reply
  13. anon   July 12, 2014 at 3:59 am

    “As they run on a battery and not gasoline, the risk of fire was always thought to be a big factor.”
    Please let this be satire.

    Reply
  14. anonymouse   July 12, 2014 at 2:31 am

    Idiot review. The first fatality from a tesla crash took roughly a year. In the same period of time around 35000 people died in the us from car crashes in total. Adjust the amounts of teslas on the road vs the total and you get 18000 cars from a 250million total. That means 1 in every 13888 car is a tesla in the us.
    To conclude: your odds of getting in a car crash in a tesla last year were 2.5 times lower than average. Every argument you make is invalid so just keep your newshungry bs articles to yourself

    Reply

Your Thoughts?