Monsanto Silences Scientist Who Explores Risks of Gene Modification [Video]


Monsanto has been accused of silencing at least one scientist who explores the potential risks associated with the company’s genetic modification technology called RNA interference (RNAi). Vicki Vance, Jr. Professor of Botany at the University of South Carolina, is a scientist who has contributed to the study of RNAi. RNAi lies at the heart of the debate on whether Monsanto is willing to admit the alleged hazards and the uncertainty associated with the technologies used to manufacture their products.

The point of this article is to reveal how Monsanto has attempted to suppress any credible scientific research containing human data that could lead to the further development on how human DNA reacts to the interference of genetically altered plant RNA through RNAi technology. The point is not to make any unsubstantiated claims that enough evidence exists to officially define this technology as dangerous to humans. The article should spark a discussion on the lack of understanding present in the public debate on RNAi.

RNAi is a gene altering process that silences gene expression to prevent the production of certain proteins that cause illness and was originally discovered by the medical community for use in pharmaceuticals. The controversy surrounding RNAi’s use in the agricultural industry stems from a lack of knowledge on whether the process causes uptake of genetically modified (GM) RNA in mammals and humans.

Greenpeace released a report on GM wheat indicating the dangers of ingesting GM RNA molecules. The organization’s main concern is RNAi is too complex to understand and could produce “unexpected and unintended” effects. The complicated nature of plant chemistry can result in unintentionally modifying the wrong genetic code which might cause unpredictable side-effects in humans and animals that eat crops treated with RNAi unless tested properly. Experiments have already begun to investigate the parallels between how human and animals react to RNAi.

One study (Poy Yu Chen et al.) conducted on how zebra fish’s respond to foreign RNA concluded that specific concentrations of the molecules actually resulted in off-target effects. This means non-targeted genes were also silenced. The study included human gene samples that were found to behave similarly to the zebra fish genes. This indicates that, according to some, more studies must be done on RNAi’s influence on human DNA before it is considered safe. Monsanto is willing to silence scientists who conduct experiments that explore the potential risks associated with its genetic modification techniques because it gives them the power to control the public’s acceptance of genetic experiments that favor their agenda.

The manner by which GM RNAi influences gene expression in humans has not been adequately tested, but that has not stopped Monsanto from considering the use of RNAi in its products. However, in order to comprehend the current debate on the credibility of scientific studies published about the subject, one must turn to the story of the Zhang experiment.

Chen-Yu Zhang led a team of scientists at the Nanjing University in China that concluded that mice take in small RNAs when they ingest plants.  Furthermore, the findings indicated that the RNA ingested by the mice may inhibit the expression of genes that remove lipoproteins, molecules that regulate cholesterol, found in the mice’s blood.

While studies on animals might not have any bearing on how humans will react to a given substance, there are some who are concerned that humans who ingest food with GM RNAi molecules could develop, “heart disease and other health issues tied to cholesterol.” When the results were published, Zhang’s study encountered a slew of resistance from the Monsanto backed research firm, miRagen Therapeutics. Vance is highly suspicious of Monsanto’s ethics and partnership with the credible research facility, but her personal encounter with Monsanto is what disturbed her the most.

Before the Zhang study was released, Monsanto scheduled Vance to give a speech on RNAi at the International Symposium of Biosafety of GMO Plants. When Vance refused to remove parts of her speech that linked her own research to the results found in the Zhang experiment, Monsanto involved their lawyers and demanded that Vance not include her findings. Vance did not fold which prompted Monsanto to officially uninvite her from the symposium.

Monsanto suggested that Vance allow their scientists to “help” her with her research. Vance refused stating that based on her 30 years of experience, “I think I know what I’m doing and when I publish the paper you can comment on it.” Monsanto replied,“We were hoping to get to it before that happens.” Vance is correct to question the motives of a company who deals in the health of millions that went out of their way to “squash” her research with an overall purpose of, “discrediting the work of this other group [Zhang et. al] and keeping people from publishing their work.”

On May 24 there will be a global March Against Monsanto to understand why more scientists are speaking out against Monsanto’s practices. Vance’s whistleblowing could potentially expose how Monsanto strategically monopolizes the scientific community’s credibility by silencing scientists who explore the risks associated with their genetic modification technology.

Opinion By Reivin Johnson

Po Yu Chen Study
Zhang Study
The Western Producer
Boulder Weekly

6 Responses to "Monsanto Silences Scientist Who Explores Risks of Gene Modification [Video]"

  1. 4mothernature2   May 23, 2014 at 10:00 pm

    My “by the way” doesn’t make sense, since the first post isn’t showing up. It was about DNA tests showing we have been exposed to pesticides, which were documented in scientific peer reviewed journals. I am making a statement that our genes are being altered and it is causing birth defects, death and lowered IQ’s to name a few…

  2. 4mothernature2   May 23, 2014 at 9:55 pm

    By the way, my daughter died after her first birthday (first birth defect in our family history), my son had memory and learning disabilities (also a first), my adoptive father had heart issues, diabetes and Alzheimers (when his siblings did not, nor was Alzheimers disease in his family history) and I will not be “silenced”.

  3. Garland Campbell   May 22, 2014 at 1:26 pm

    Did they kill him? Er, I mean did he commit suicide? That’s usually how Scientists are silenced!!! GMO is UNnatural and IS NOT HEALTHFUL. MONSANTO IS TOTALLY IGNORANT OF SECRETS OF THE SOIL!!!!

  4. tony s   May 21, 2014 at 2:40 pm

    This is a complete fabrication. give me Monsanto people names and I will ask my friend who works for them

  5. Enviro Equipment, Inc.   May 21, 2014 at 12:21 pm

    I tend to be skeptical of claims from groups such as Greenpeace that GMOs will result in a biological apocalypse because in the past, similar claims have proven to be a gross exaggerations, if not outright misrepresentations of facts. However, in this case, it’s pretty clear that Monsanto didn’t want Ms. Vance to disclose what she had to say, leading me to think that there’s something unsafe with Monsanto’s RNAi technology/research.

  6. Courtney Anderson   May 20, 2014 at 5:00 pm

    You are officially my go-to for monsanto biz, and this makes me very pleased. pleased indeed.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.