Autism Research Needs to be Allowed to Move Past Vaccines


In recent decades there has been much trepidation and heated debate regarding the safety of vaccines and the possible link between vaccines and the development of autism in young children.  It is a public health issue that has been taken very seriously amongst both the parenting and medical communities and the resulting research has shown, definitively, that there is no causal link between vaccines and consequential autism development.

The origins of the critical eyes being cast upon vaccines are found in a man named Andrew Wakefield.  Formerly employed at the Royal Free Hospital in London, Wakefield revealed, in 1998, a study he had headed in which a direct link between the M.M.R. vaccine and autism was found.  His study was published and garnered great attention.

It was then promptly discredited, eventually thoroughly, by multiple research teams and agencies.  No one was able to replicate his findings, an essential part of the peer-review process needed to lend credibility to scientific claims.  In fact, there are numerous studies who are actually peer-reviewed that state, in no uncertain terms, that the link between vaccines and autism simply doesn’t exist.

Many studies have fallen to the peer review process, however.  What makes Wakefield’s situation unique is that his study has created widespread, long lasting fear that could have dire consequences to lots of young children and their families.  Despite the lack of scientific support, Wakefield continues to try and spread his message as medically sound advice.

The peer review process is not the only problems that have been found with Wakefield’s study, either.  Andrew Wakefield’s research methods were so flawed that they were found to violate multiple ethical codes.  When conducting research on human beings, many things are expected.  First, researchers should not gather funds from sources that are personally invested in the outcome of said study.  Further, when using human participants in research, every possible precaution must be taken to spare those people from as much risk of harm as possible.

Wakefield was working with an especially vulnerable group of people as they were both children and developmentally disabled and he subjected them to medical procedures that were not needed and were excessively invasive, greatly increasing the risk for both physical and mental harm.

It was determined that his financial dealings regarding funding for his study were questionable and deceptive.

He was also found to have manipulated the data in order to produce the outcome he wanted.  He was unable to reproduce his findings because the findings were fabricated in the first place.

Wakefield was subsequently stripped of his credentials and is no longer allowed to practice medicine.  Yet, because of the fear of direct harm to their children, or the need for answers in those whose children have autism, parents continue to fear and scrutinize the use of vaccines.  And Wakefield fans these flames by continuing to misinform the public as fast as he is capable.


The consequences of his actions are that parents, given only part of a seriously flawed story, shy away from vaccinating their children.  Reports of increasing incidents of diseases have spread beyond the M.M.R. vaccine to include other dangerous illness such as whooping cough as parents’ semi-informed fears generalize past the initial claims of Wakefield’s tampered with and unethical research to encompass all vaccines indiscriminately.

Andrew Wakefield is a thoroughly discredited figure who opposes sound scientific evidence, presented by professionals whose credentials are still intact.  Their results, not his, have been replicated; they agree with each other and that is no small feat for a group of scientists.

The actual causes of autism or not understood right now.  Much more research will be needed to attempt to narrow down our understanding of the factors involved with the development of this spectrum of disorders.  The strongest current evidence points to a link between genetic factors and brain development.  What is known is that there is plenty of sound scientific evidence against the link between vaccines, their administration and autism.  Research really needs to be allowed to move forward, beyond this non-issue, so that real answers about autism can hopefully be found.

By Vanessa Blanchard

Source 1

Source 2

Source 3

3 Responses to "Autism Research Needs to be Allowed to Move Past Vaccines"

  1. Barbara Bickel Hafer   August 25, 2013 at 3:13 pm

    Research must be directed to where the science actually leads us, which has been proven time and again not to be vaccines. The autistic community is through being used to their detriment by the anti-vaxxers. I wish the anti-vaxxers would return to their alien autopsy coverups or the “the moon landing was faked” fantasies. At least those are harmless.

  2. john fryer   August 24, 2013 at 3:34 am

    Dodgy trials should be punished to the highest level and RIGHTLY so.

    Andrew Wakefield was thrown out of the MEDICAL world by the prestigious GMC regulators.

    We must thank them for their DILIGENCE?

    But can we look at other DODGY research: PLEASE!

    Is it right that we dont KNOW what is in a vaccine – COMMERCIAL SECRET – SORRY!

    Is it right that even if, (and heaven knows it never does), that the vaccines HARM us, the industry should be immune from investigation, prosecution and punishment themselves. They CANNOT be charged with murder even if they put CYANIDE in their products (They NEVER do and NEVER will).

    Read this and inwardly digest.

    IS it a lie?


    Is it correct to prove safety for a new vaccine by using one, that France for example ABANDONED on safety grounds?

    And that punishment meted out to Andrew. Why did the others get off scott free in the FINAL analysis. 12 other ADULTS put their names to that paper.

    And what exactly do the European vaccine companies do with HALF A TON of ORGANOMERCURY every YEAR in 2013 and for the past 40 years or so ? (They do not put it in MMR except by ACCIDENT a few times?)

    Google Search KAREN WETTERHAHN and find what a fraction of a gram of ORGANOMERCURY did to her after 5 months in her body.

    Adult autism folowed by DEATH in ten months?

    What chance to find vaccine effects so far ahead when Sally Clark lost her child 6 hours after a vaccine and the topic of VACCINES never got more than a sentence in the courts. And NEVER ever was blamed for the sudden death. The death certificate in 2013 still records MURDER but not by whom (the vaccine industry?)

    AFTER the vaccine HARRY would be protected from DEATH (roy meadow quote) hence it was MURDER!

    HANG HER HIGH or some such judgement please – DOUBLE LIFE she got.

    We had moved on back then (from vaccine harm to vaccine protection) as wanted yet again here.

    And that picture is about as emotional as Roy Meadow explaining how his next victim Sally did the same suffocation to her child as 1 million other SIDS who died over the years.

    Yes we do need vaccines but not at the cost of



    TEN MILLION Autism Spectrum Disorder children

    Clever enough to make vaccines and prove ‘safety’.

    BUT dumb enough:

    NOT to know the causes for SIDS, autism, diabetes etc etc etc.

  3. joejoe   August 22, 2013 at 7:40 am

    Dr.Wakefields studies concluded that more research was needed in 1998, today 15 years later, ‘no progress’ specifically, no vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies. We need to get these studies out of the way so that there is no doubt, and then move on, its not asking much to do a retrospective study on the subject and is a valid option frequently used by researchers.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.