Global Warming, Video Game Violence Deniers Roll Dice With Science

Global Warming, Video Game Violence Deniers Roll Dice with Science

Global warming and violent video games are both issues on which there is overwhelming consensus within the science community, but where millions of laypeople with no credentials or science background and a handful of rogue scientists roll the dice on everyone’s safety by denying the consensus of the larger medical/science community.

In the case of global warming deniers, NASA confirms that 97% of scientists agree that global warming is a fact, and that global warming is a man made problem. Yes, there are scientists who “disagree,” and they represent 3% of the scientific community. They produce their own studies and publish them all over the place. They shout loudly in the media and spread their propaganda enthusiastically on television and in newapapers and magazines.

These rogue scientists manage to convince millions of people that 97% of scientists are wrong and that 3% of scientists are right. Thus, the “debate” over global warming exists, but it’s not a debate in the larger science community. The answer has been found; the consensus has been reached; the debate is over among the vast majority of scientists.

NASA, in speaking about a study that was conducted to find out if, indeed, there is a consensus among climate change scientists about the issue, states, “The study, by John Cook, of the University of Queensland’s Global Change Institute in Australia…confirms that climate scientists have not only accepted the existence of global warming, but also its human causation, as a matter of fact for the last two decades.”

Despite this consensus, the issue is considered to be a “debate” by many people. In fact, you can take it to the bank that commenters will even deny that NASA has confirmed this consensus. Denial seems to be a stronger force than reason these days.

This is also the case with video game violence deniers. A consenus has been reached within the medical community. The debate has officially been declared “over” by The American Psychological Association, which states “the debate is over” when it comes to whether or not violent video games are linked to violence. The consensus within the medical community has been established that violent video games are causal in increased aggression, and the American Psychological Association says that “many criticisms are simply recycled myths from earlier media violence debates, myths that have been repeatedly debunked on theoretical and empirical grounds.”

Specifically, The American Psychological Associaton states that one of the most repeated myths is: “Violent video game research has yielded very mixed results.”

They go on the say that the actual facts are:

Some studies have yielded nonsignificant video game effects, just as some smoking studies failed to find a significant link to lung cancer. But when one combines all relevant empirical studies using meta-analytic techniques, five separate effects emerge with considerable consistency. Violent video games are significantly associated with: increased aggressive behavior, thoughts, and affect; increased physiological arousal; and decreased prosocial (helping) behavior. Average effect sizes for experimental studies (which help establish causality) and correlational studies (which allow examination of serious violent behavior) appear comparable (Anderson & Bushman, 2001).

A complete list of myths and facts about violent video games is available in the source section below.

Now, psychologists have moved on to the question of why people deny violent video game effects, and they say that the reason is partially because of the media. The media has been proven to, over time, increase the number of reports stating that violent video games are not linked to violence, even though according to five major medical and psychlogical associations, that is not true. In his paper titled The effects of violent video games. Do they affect our behavior? Psychologist Brad Bushman says there are also other reasons why people deny the effects of violent video games. One of those is:

… people may think: “I play violent video games and I’ve never killed anyone.” This fallacious reasoning is a good example of how the “availability heuristic” coupled with the “base rate problem” (Kahneman & Tversky, 1973) distort reasoning…It is not surprising that people who play violent video games have not killed anyone because very few people kill anyone…However, murder is the most salient violent event to most people; so when they don’t have “available” in memory cases of people playing violent games and then murdering, they ignore the base rate of murder and conclude that violent games have no effect on aggression.

The other reasons why people deny violent video game effects, Bushman says, is because this distorted reasoning is paired with the fact that people do not understand psychological processes very well. Between the media reports, distorted reasoning and misunderstanding of psychological processes, there is a perfect storm of ignorance and denial.

Now, people even deny that there is consensus among scientists about global warming and/or video game violence when the evidence is abundantly clear and easily found on the official websites of NASA and the American Psychological Association and four other major medical associations too. It becomes maddening when faced with such obstinate denial and refusal to examine the evidence and apply critical thinking skills to issues that have long been settled among the experts who actually have the credentials to decide what the right answer is.

Global warming deniers and video game violence deniers roll the dice with science. Meanwhile, oceans continue to rise. Ice caps are melting away daily; polar bears are starving to death and mass shootings go on and on. Denial is dangerous, and those that continue to roll the dice in this way gamble with our future.

By: Rebecca Savastio


Source 1

Source 2

Source 3

Source 4

Source 5

Source 6

Source 7

Source 8

Source 9

10 Responses to "Global Warming, Video Game Violence Deniers Roll Dice With Science"

  1. docsal   October 2, 2013 at 12:46 pm

    If video game violence is linked with violent behavior to a scientific certainty, the why has violent crime in America decrease almost linearly as video game violence has increased ? By the way, making causal conclusions based on meta analysis of medical studies has been debunked for at least 20 years.

  2. Paul Searle   September 29, 2013 at 10:49 am

    I don’t see how evidence for a link between video games and violence vindicates the Global warming theory. There has been no increase in Global temperatures for the past fifteen years, the ice cap is at record levels and yet there is no debate, the science is conclusive?

    The only thing that’s conclusive is that no one really seems to understand what’s going on, those who claim any dissenting voices are unscientific ‘deniers of facts’ are incapable of explaining the facts that don’t comply with their theory.

    • barney jones   October 1, 2013 at 6:30 am

      “There has been no increase in Global temperatures for the past fifteen years”

      No increase for 26 years depending on which data source you use.

      “The only thing that’s conclusive is that no one really seems to understand what’s going on”

      Exactly right friend. It takes a record high sea ice extent in 35 years that grew by 29% in one year and a relatively calm hurricane season for the IPCC and its acolytes to admit that their predictions were wrong and that natural variation is more powerful than any AGW. But given that AGW has become such a lucrative post modern religion for the few and an silly opiate for the many who need a cause to fight for, a new religion on sorts, it is easy to see how in the fact of contradictory evidence that AGW proponents are sticking to their unscientific rhetoric about insurmountable evidence and the CO2 apocalypse now propaganda.

  3. batman is bad for your kids   September 24, 2013 at 12:15 pm

    in other news: spider man is corrupting your children and rock music is turning them to satan.

    i remember them using the same research they are now with comics and music. it was junk then and it is junk now. and this entire thing reads like those nutty tabloids that you find wasting away at supermarkets saying obama is an ET.

  4. Rebecca Savastio   September 23, 2013 at 5:12 pm

    @Six: Where does it say the parentsagainstviolence is a “scientific” source? Journalist list ALL the things they read and look at when writing an article. Did you miss the APA website’s list of video myths and facts, gathered over 30 years of research and support by thousands of studies? Guess so.

  5. Jana Lenkiewicz   September 23, 2013 at 8:31 am
    The answer is, no, for many people, facts and sience do not matter.

  6. Six   September 23, 2013 at 12:21 am

    At least in regards to the video game part, what a shockingly poorly researched article, and linking to as a reliable “scientific” source?…I’m surprised there are no links to Daily Mail articles!

  7. Yes Way   September 22, 2013 at 10:22 pm

    I never understand the Global Warning argument – what is there to lose in developing clean energy?
    Don’t people want to live in a world where the air is fresh, the water is clean and food is plentiful?

    • barney jones   October 1, 2013 at 6:39 am

      “I never understand the Global Warning argument – what is there to lose in developing clean energy?”

      There is nothing to lose in developing clean energy at all. But if you force poor people not to use fossil fuels to develop their communities and countries or tax them highly for doing so, you are only contributing to poverty NOT alleviating it. “Clean” energy is not cheap when we are talking about the amount of energy needed to industrialize and develop a poor country. To stop a poor country from exploiting it’s OWN fuel sources under the pretext of an as yet unproved inference that man made CO2 emmissions significantly affect global temperature, is wicked and inhumane at best and vile, selfish and nasty at worst.

      NATO and European powers pay attention: Until nuclear fusion and clean energy becomes a cheap and feasible option in bringing a country to developed status or until AGW can be proven to be true let the poor dig the oil and coal out of the ground and stop this desperate power grab to keep the divide between rich and poor as deep as possible. It’s EVIL.

  8. Dude (@Dude02764782)   September 22, 2013 at 12:17 pm

    Too bad there is no warming, no hurricanes. I guess its hard to think with Al gores meat down your collective over reactive throats but at least the media is doing what it does best.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.