Who Would Dare to Kill a Mockingbird? Michael Gove, That’s Who

to kill a mockingbirdIn a peculiar display of cultural xenophobia, Michael Gove, education minister in the UK government, has banned American classics from the school exams syllabus. For many years Of Mice and Men and To Kill a Mockingbird have been set texts for students taking English Literature as a subject. His highly personal decision, (he is said to particularly despise Of Mice and Men,) has sparked off a storm of protest.

Twitter has been trending with defenders of these two iconic books. The Arthur Miller play The Crucible, is also struck off the list. From next year, the focus is back on the British canon with the required reading being a novel pre-dating the twentieth century by a British author such as Charles Dickens or Jane Austen, a romantic poem, and a play by Shakespeare. All exam boards will have to follow these guidelines. One tweeter sagely remarked that Michael Gove might have done well to read To Kill a Mockingbird himself. He then could have taken Atticus’ advice that it was polite to talk to others about what they were interested in. His educational ideas are highly personal and widely thought to be reactionary. Some say they take British education right back to the 1940s.

Bethan Marshall, who chairs the National Association for Teaching of English, expressed her fears that children would be ground down by being forced to read Dickens, and that it would put them off further study at a higher level. She fears that the “tedious” curriculum will be “incredibly depressing” for schools when they see it. The Department of Education retaliated by stating they are putting the focus back on “tradition.”

The professor of American studies at the University of East Anglia compared the move to the effort to tighten immigration control at the country’s borders. Christopher Bigsby said it was an attempt to stop “Romanian novels moving in next door.” Actor Mark Gatiss, the creator of BBC’s Sherlock series, wrote about Gove, saying “This man is a philistine.” Gatiss wondered what gave “the wretched” Gove the right to decide what children should and should not read.

Bigsby went on to analyze the banned books and question their value. He notes the core messages in each. The Crucible is all about a man who has the bravery to oppose those in power, To Kill a Mockingbird deals with racial prejudice and justice and Of Mice and Men commiserates with the poor and illiterate. They are all about empathy, understanding, and the bigger human picture. Any multi-cultural country would wish to encourage a wider world vision by sharing such stories outside of the known.

Gove’s idealistic view of teenage reading matter had him telling an independent schools conference last year that he would much prefer to find one reading Middlemarch by George Eliot than one of Stephanie Meyer’s Twilight series. Literacy advocates have long upheld that it does not matter what children read, as long as they find something they enjoy reading. Harry Potter alone is credited with bringing millions of hitherto book-averse kids to a love of literature. Gove though, finds it “incredibly disappointing” that 90 percent of all students of English in England were studying Steinbeck’s classic Of Mice and Men.

Dame Helen Mirren recently said that no child under 15 should be allowed to read Shakespeare as it was her firm belief that any first experience of the Bard should occur in the theatre at a production. Her ideal age for this to happen was 13 or 14. Her own first taste of Shakespeare was a performance of Hamlet when she was fifteen years old and she was electrified. She made these remarks on the 450th anniversary of his death this year on April 23.

Another British theatrical great, the playwright Alan Bennett, also said recently that his preference was for American writers, and that he did not find anything in contemporary British writing that spoke to him. His favorite author was Philip Roth, who has not appeared on exam curriculums for this age group, nevertheless, he made a strong case for the eminence of American writing.

Clearly these luminaries are at odds with Mr Gove, education minister, who seeks to inflict analysis of Shakespearian text upon reluctant teens and to ban them from experiencing the great writers from across the Atlantic.What experience does he possess to make him right, and them wrong? He read English Literature at Oxford and was a Times journalist before entering politics.

One might be inclined to assume that this man has no children of his own, and speaks from a vacuum, but in fact he is a father. His children are aged 11 and 9 and his wife, Sarah Vine, told an audience last week that she had seriously considered sending them abroad to live. This would be to shield them from the hatred they see directed toward their father. Her own mother lives in Italy and she had thought of sending them there. She later retracted the idea, saying they were not “shrinking violets” and that this would “toughen them up” but she did think there “would be payback.” She said she received a lot of emails from people “who really, really hate Michael.”

Harper Lee, speaking through her character, Miss Maudie, said it was a sin to kill a mockingbird. Mockingbirds only make music for folks to enjoy. All great writing, including the Pulitzer prize winning To Kill a Mockingbird, is music for all readers to enjoy. By banning it from British schoolchildren’s awareness, Michael Gove is determined to kill the mockingbird.

By Kate Henderson


BBC News

5 Responses to "Who Would Dare to Kill a Mockingbird? Michael Gove, That’s Who"

  1. Emmanuel Love   March 9, 2019 at 1:10 am

    Hey, how’s it going?

    Did you hear that the powers that run this world want to put a RFID microchip in our body? It will contain not only our bank accounts but our personal information, making us total slaves to the elite. This will cause us to lose even more of our privacy.

    Did you know that this RFID microchip matches perfectly with the Mark of the Beast in the Bible, more specifically Revelation 13:16-18?

    “He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name…”

    Referring to the last days, this could only be speaking of a cashless society, which we have yet to see, but are heading towards. Otherwise, we could still buy or sell without the mark amongst others if physical money was still currency. It’s amazing that the Bible foretold a cashless society!

    Did you also hear that the Jewish people are in the process of bringing about the Third Temple prophesied in the Bible by the prophet Daniel, Jesus, and Apostle Paul? They deny Jesus as their Messiah and say their Messiah will be revealed to rule the whole world under a one world religion. They are not even hiding this information, but are actually promoting it. You can view videos about this on YouTube.

    When Donald Trump made Jerusalem captial of Israel in late December 2017, the Jewish people said this was a big step for them to build this Third Temple. They even printed a Temple coin with president Trump’s face on the front with king Cyrus'(the man who built the Second Temple in the Bible) face behind him. On the back of the coin is an image of the Third Temple. They are selling these coins to raise money to build the Temple.

    People have been saying for many years that the end is near, but we needed not only the Third Temple, but also the technology for there to be a cashless society for the Mark of the Beast to be a reality.

    There is much more to know, please visit http://WWW.BIBLEFREEDOM.COM to see all the proof!


  2. Mr T   May 29, 2014 at 9:17 am

    Check your facts before lazy journalism. He hasn’t banned anything.

    • Kate Henderson   May 29, 2014 at 9:47 am

      No, sir, you are the lazy one, waiting three full days after this story was published to deign to post a comment. In that space of time Gove has of course reacted to the considerable and justifiable hostility, and denied his interference in the syllabus. It was the head of the major examination board OCR, Paul Dodd, who initially quoted his remarks and said they had influenced policy. Gove now calls such people “culture warriors” and claims never to have met them. He realised he had made a big mistake and took pains to cover his tracks.

  3. JY   May 28, 2014 at 2:40 am

    Well done Mr Gove, for everything. To Kill a Mockingbird is a deeply political book, which only serves to consecrate diversity, ethnic immigration, create generations of angry black kids and justify hostility toward western society. The left are angry that one of ‘their’ books has been taken off the curriculum, but Gove didn’t go far enough. What if a book about white slavery replaced To Kill A Mockingbird? Say, Thomas Pellow’s slave narrative, The History of the Long Captivity and Adventures of Thomas Pellow. The Cornish author was abducted by muslim pirates and sold on the slave markets of Marakesh, a fate which befell a million other Europeans. American slavery is far away in distance and time, but to be sold as a sex slave by muslims, is again a reality for thousands of English schoolgirls.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.