Neil deGrasse Tyson Infuriates Climate Change Deniers

tyson
Astrophysicist and host of Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey Neil deGrasse Tyson infuriated climate change deniers on Sunday when a climate change-focused episode of Cosmos was aired on Fox and the National Geographic channel on Monday. Cosmos is no stranger to stirring up controversy among certain sectors of the population who disbelieve climate change, the Big Bang, and evolution, all subjects that the show, originally created and hosted by Carl Sagan, has now touched upon.

The 13-episode series will conclude this coming Sunday by airing Unafraid of the Dark, and has seen remarkably high viewership. The climate change episode tied ABC’s The Bachelorette in ratings among advertisers’ “key demographic,” young adult viewers. Tyson notes that the most important fact is that although “the ratings are exceeding our expectations,” the show demonstrates that science is “trending in our culture.”

Tyson made an important distinction in Sunday’s episode between weather and climate change. Certain infuriated deniers have attempted to refute climate change pointing to weather patterns, corrected by the host in Sunday’s Cosmos episode. One of the more infamous examples of this sort of denial was Donald Trump’s tweet earlier in the year which included the statements “Our planet is freezing … our GW scientists are stuck in ice.”

Tyson used a visual analogy to distinguish between short-term weather patterns and long-term trends in climate change by walking his dog on a beach. In the analogy the leashed dog is weather and Tyson is climate, comparing the meandering pooch as weather making short-term erratic changes with Tyson’s consistent path being the long-term trend of a changing climate. This clip in the episode highlights the fact that although winters may continue to be inconveniently cold, at least for now, climate change is predicted by major scientific research conducted by institutions such as NASA and the World Meteorological Organization to have very serious ramifications in the not-so-distant future.

The dog on the beach analogy was a simple reminder of the distinction of weather and climate. The episode beyond that visual was more characteristically expansive in its explanation of climate change, looking at the oxygenation of the atmosphere through burgeoning plant life in the Carboniferous period 300 million years ago, and other ancient periods of dramatic climate change including ice ages, continental drift, and asteroid impacts.

“We just can’t seem to stop burning … coal … oil and gas,” Tyson stated in the episode. “If we could, we’d be home free.” The episode began with a trip in the “Ship of the Imagination” to Venus, our sister planet, to review what its runaway greenhouse effect did to the inner solar system planet. The planet is depicted with boiling oceans and “sickening yellow” skies. Tyson’s predecessor Carl Sagan extensively studied the greenhouse effect of Venus, and planetary fates as determined by megaforces.

Tyson appeared on MSNBC’s All In with Chris Hayes the day following Fox’s broadcasting of Cosmos. In the interview, while Tyson affirmed that in the United States people are free to “believe what you want,” the problem is when governance is not “based on objective and verifiable truths.” While last Sunday’s Cosmos episode was predictably infuriating to some climate change deniers, Tyson points to a surefire way to get more people to come around to its acceptance: “People beginning to lose their wealth.”

By Jesse Eells-Adams

Sources:
Huffington Post
Grist
Mother Jones
Mother Jones
Mother Jones
Mediaite
Climate Change Dispatch
Twitter, Donald Trump

29 Responses to "Neil deGrasse Tyson Infuriates Climate Change Deniers"

  1. Faustino Buvinghausen   March 6, 2019 at 5:19 pm

    With thanks! Valuable information!

    Reply
  2. Jamel Grenet   February 28, 2019 at 2:21 pm

    I truly enjoy looking through on this web site , it holds superb content .

    Reply
  3. Ivan Kirkpatrick   June 9, 2014 at 10:23 am

    Climate change is not really the issue. The climate is always changing. The theory that manmade CO2 is causing global warming is based on unproved and arguably weak data. How much do you want to spend on CO2 reduction only to find out that was not the problem?

    Reply
  4. Rob   June 9, 2014 at 9:43 am

    Never heard of this Tyson guy.

    Reply
  5. Bart   June 9, 2014 at 9:22 am

    I can see that some comments come from the infuriated, the disappointed, the surprised, the people who are full of suppositions, or not.

    They mention the common fallacies many have pushed for years on their own uncritical followers, questions long ago addressed by scientists, such as the role of water vapor or clouds, the feedback mechanism that makes CO2 come out of the oceans when the tilt of the Earth heats them, perhaps they will get around eventually to other misleadingly worded trivia about albedo, convection, ocean currents, solar flares or those other short term influences that by themselves are little more than the wagging of the tail of a dog on a leash.

    Watch the man, not the dog.

    The man, the self-made man, is trending hotter.

    Scientists don’t say this to get bigger grants or television shows or because they support a particular politics: they say this because simple arithmetic, simple observations, and simple reasoning that they have in great numbers dedicated their lives to improving point this way.

    So yes, some regions and some times of year in some regions get colder or wetter in the short term as the dog’s nose explores the extreme low side of the leash, attracted by volcanoes or little ocean wiggle lines or sunspots, for a time.

    The man continues on a path paved in coal and oil, burning up the air.

    You’d think that would infuriate people more.

    Reply
  6. Daniel   June 9, 2014 at 6:42 am

    To anyone out there who still denies that climate change is real, and that mankind has no effect on the climate: THE KING HAS NO CLOTHES……

    Reply
  7. Amanda   June 9, 2014 at 6:40 am

    One of my best friends studied meteorology, and I have extensive conversations with him regarding this topic. Firstly, if you do not have a degree in this topic, I feel you do not reserve the right to even speak of it. That being said, anyone that denies this is man made, denies that we are on the wrong path is a fool. Your children, and your childrens children will likely see the beginning of the end of this world as we know it. And we can blame no one but ourselves….but as selfish as modren day humans are, what do they care for those they don’t even know yet…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.