ADHD on the Rise but Some Experts Say It’s a Scam

ADHD

ADHD, especially the “parent diagnosed” type, is on the rise in the United States. A new study released earlier this week found a significant increase in ADHD diagnoses in new results compiled from a 2011 telephone survey. In that survey, 11% of children had received a diagnosis of ADHD. Four years prior, a similar survey found that only 9.5% of parents believed their child had been diagnosed with ADHD. While most major medical and psychological associations put forth the view that ADHD is a real disease that often requires drug treatment, some experts say the disease was fabricated many years ago and is a scam being perpetrated by large pharmaceutical companies.

Dr. Fred Baughman, a child neurologist with over 35 years of experience in the field, says that ADHD is a fraud crafted by drug companies and maintained by the child psychiatric industry. “Psychiatry has never validated ADHD as a biologic entity,” Dr. Baughman told PBS, “so their fraud and their misrepresentation is in saying to the parents of the patients in the office, saying to the public of the United States, that this and every other psychiatric diagnosis is, in fact, a brain disease.”

Dr. Baughman seems to indicate that the disease is not real at all, and parents take advantage of the diagnosis as a way to avoid the responsibility and extra work that comes with “optimal” parenting. Teachers are also to blame, he says, because it’s much easier to name a list of undesirable behaviors and drug a child than it is to deal with the child in the classroom each day.

He’s not the only expert who feels that ADHD is a scam even though it is on the rise. Dr. Edward C. Hamlyn says the condition is a “fraud” specifically created for the purpose of getting children addicted to drugs at a young age so they will continue to purchase those drugs throughout their lives.

Perhaps the most significant expert who feels ADHD is fraudulent is the “father” of the disease itself- the late Dr. Leon Eisenberg. Eisenberg is considered the founder of the disorder, yet it’s been reported that he himself made a dramatic “deathbed confession” about ADHD being fabricated, and said it is a “prime example of a fictitious disease.” He also stated it is widely over-diagnosed and seemed to imply he was dismayed to see how the drug companies push their products on an unsuspecting public.

While some media outlets disagree that Eisenberg used the exact words “fictitious disease,” a quick check of the urban myth website Snopes.com reveals that the information is “partly true,” because some native German speakers interpret the passage in the original story about the interview with Dr. Eisenberg to mean that he was only saying it was overdiagnosed. However, in that same Snopes article, there is still a snippet of the original article that contains a direct quote from Dr. Eisenberg using the exact words “fictitious disease.”

ADHD has recently been on the rise, but some experts say it’s a scam. So which is it? Is ADHD a real and substantiated neurobiological disease, or, as some experts assert, a fake construct of greedy drug companies? Either way, what is the explanation for the drastic increase in this disease over the last several years? Only 3-7 percent of children are thought to actually have ADHD, so many physicians are concerned about over-prescribing of drugs to children who don’t really need them. Certainly, it would appear that more research is needed to determine if any additional societal constructs are contributing to the perceived rise in ADHD.

By: Rebecca Savastio

New York Times

PBS

Med Page Today

Natural News

3 Responses to "ADHD on the Rise but Some Experts Say It’s a Scam"

  1. Chris J.   September 25, 2014 at 4:17 pm

    ADHD is fraud. I’ve heard that they have evidence that proves ADHD exists. What’s funny is I’ve never seen it and I’ve tried researching it several times. It’s all talk. Also, what someone discovers in a lab can only be applied to the real world if the tests being used are the same; which is not the case for ADHD. Even if the evidence for ADHD did exist, we still can’t say a real world patient has ADHD because we don’t use the same tests in the real world as we do in the lab. I’ve known dozens of people including myself (20+) who have been diagnosed with ADHD and NOT a single one of them has had a scientific test performed on them for ADHD. Why? Because there isn’t one. The only test they perform in the real world for ADHD is a 10 minute verbal conversation, and that’s suppose to be evidence??? If talking is a valid way to determine if someone has ADHD or not, why can’t we diagnose cancer, diabetes, thyroid disease, neutropenia, and other diseases by talking? Hell, what’s the point of even doing blood and urine tests if everything can be diagnosed by talking?

    Reply
  2. Katherine Jaconello   March 25, 2014 at 7:54 am

    ADHD is simply a collection of behaviour characteristics that are considered criminal (if the truth were known). The brain scans? Trickery. In the 1971 book “Psychotropic Drugs in the Year 2000 – Use by Normal Humans”, compiled by 2 MK ULTRA operatives, Wayne O. Evans and Nathan S. Kline, children are only covered in the chapter “The Use of Psychotropic Drugs with Criminals” written by psychiatrist Oscar Resnick. Resnick spent his life doing experiments in the MK ULTRA projects in prisons. Prisoners got paid $1 for being research subjects of psychoactive drugs. The ADHD characteristics are embodied in that chapter with recommendations by non other than Leon Eisenberg to use psychiatric drugs to control them. Much as all the amphetamine and methylphenidate and antidepressant addicts, their psychiatrists who make billions off them and the subsidiary industries like the schools, the mental health workers, the lawyers, courts, Children’s Aid, children’s psychiatric community centres and the rest of the $338 billion industry might like to believe, ADHD is a scam.

    Reply
  3. Matt Berry   January 11, 2014 at 10:51 pm

    The author needs to check their facts. Dr. Leon Eisenberg only stated that it was overused diagnosis. Furthermore, neurologists are grossly undertrained and educated in ADHD and in fact, there have been numerous researchers that has shown a distinct difference between the brains of those with and without ADHD on SPECT scans.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.