Microbes Found Deep in the Ocean Have Not Evolved in Two Billion Years

microbes

Off the coast of Australia, there is a type of microbe that has been found to not have evolved in two billion years. The microscopic organisms were found wedged inside deep-sea rocks along the coast. Even though they have not evolved in such a long time, Charles Darwin’s theory can be proved right, scientists say.

At the location where they were found, a research team discovered and gathered fossilized sulfur bacteria that was estimated at 1.8 billion years old. They compared these microbes to bacteria found in the same general area that was dated to be 2.3 billion years old. Both groups of microbes were nearly indistinguishable from present sulphur bacteria found in deep waters off the coast of Chile. Though, do these findings dispute Darwin’s understanding and findings regarding evolution?

Paleobiologist J. William Schopf, the study’s leader from the University of California – Los Angeles, stated that the study shows an astonishing development. He explained the fact that any form of life has not engaged in evolution for two billion years is unbelievable. He said the fact that evolution is one of the main factors of life, the lack of it needs to be explained.

Darwin’s theory of evolution due to natural selection is that all the world’s species, flora and fauna alike, progress from inherited genetic changes that increase the individual’s chances of survival and reproduction in its environment.

How can Darwin’s theory explain the lack of change for the sea-dwelling bacteria? The answer lies in the surroundings of the aforementioned bacteria. The main factor of this environment is that it is stable. Even though the bacteria have not changed in eons, the notion is still parallel with Darwin’s theory of evolution, change has not been necessity as the environment has not changed, Schopf said. Darwin’s theory does not mean life has to change continuously. Darwin’s theory only states that life must change if the environment changes and further advanced variations of genes will make the organism impermeable to threats in its niche. Therefore, the lack of evolution in the microbes is congruent with Darwin’s theory.

Schopf and his research team compared fossils to back up their findings. They used a technique called Raman spectroscopy. Raman spectroscopy is used to measure the composition and chemistry of ancient rocks. Using a confocal laser scanning microscope, the team was able to create 3-dimensional images of the microscopic fossils and compare them with computer images of modern bacteria. Schopf’s team found that the eons-old microbes literally mirrored the present-day organisms.

The fossils discovered date back to the Great Oxidation Event. This period of time occurred when surface oxygen levels on Earth surged around 2.2 to 2.4 billion years ago. During the Great Oxidation Event there was a large rise in nitrate and sulfate levels. This provided the sustenance needed to allow the bacteria to survive, thrive, and reproduce.

The researchers explained that since the environment in the deep-sea rock formations has not altered since the time of the Great Oxidation, there has not been a need for the microbes to adapt to a different environment. Since the environment in which the microbes of deep-sea depths live has not altered in over two billion years, Darwin’s theory of evolution still reigns strong.

By: Alex Lemieux

Live Science

Science World Report

Los Angeles Times

Picture: Argonne National Laboratory – Flickr License

One Response to "Microbes Found Deep in the Ocean Have Not Evolved in Two Billion Years"

  1. ricares   February 4, 2015 at 4:44 am

    So, is life an static process too? And, was mutation and splitting the origin of death, the ending of cloning itself endlessly? Besides, is there evolution if there is no time? How will evolutionary biology meet new physical paradigms about time, space and so on? Will new conceptual changes deny evolution? Or on the contrary, will it become a more extraordinary process, full of astonishing implications? If so, will past human beings and the rest of living beings become something different as science progresses? Beacause, is life something fix-finite-defined? That is, can one understand it by means of using a flesh brain and its limited words, axioms and dogmas? Does the whole of life fit inside a word, inside a bone box? Indeed, will science add indefinitely without understanding completely, is there an infinite pool of knowledge and ignorance waiting for us? Along these lines, there is a different book, a preview in http://goo.gl/8Ax6gL Just another suggestion in order to freethink for a while

    Reply

Your Thoughts?