LGBT Activists and the Fascism of Diversity

LGBT Activists and The Fascism of Diversity
If any of the mainstream media outlets in the United States, with the obvious exception of Fox News, were to draw up a list of the least tolerant groups, associations and organizations in the nation, the result would be completely predictable. Not necessarily in this order, it would read: The TEA Party; the NRA; the Republican Party; Rush Limbaugh listeners; Fox News viewers and, no doubt, anyone who works for Fox News; Glenn Beck listeners; Christians; any other group that believes in patriotism, the Constitution and traditional values. The pre-programmed refrain would be that these groups do not accept diversity. True diversity, however, occurs when people of different faiths, lifestyles, ethnic backgrounds and nationalities come together organically. When diversity is forced upon a people, it is nothing more than a political charade; it is, indeed, a type of fascism.

The above list is, of course, dictated by those who provide the thoughts that fill the heads of today’s American Liberals. Completely ignored is the fact that neither the TEA Party, the NRA nor the Republican Party have any more restrictions on who they accept than does the Democratic Party or any leftwing organization in the country. Demographically, the make-up of the TEA Party closely reflects the make-up of the nation in every way but age-group. The Republican Party has put more blacks in Congress than the Democratic Party, whose members founded the Ku Klux Klan. In addition, the Republican Party has given the nation more female cabinet members and state governors than the Democratic Party. It has also given the nation more state Governors from ethnic minorities. As for Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck; these three undisputed media giants employ, collectively, more Liberals than all other media outlets, collectively, employ Conservatives. Their viewers and listeners, if intolerant at all, are no more so than those who watch MSNBC or CNN or those who listen to NPR.

The Progressive movement, in order to conceal its agenda of complete control and enslavement, has, years ago, taken up the banner of ‘diversity’. In truth, however, the Progressive movement is the least tolerant and least diverse entity in the US. Those who identify with it have routinely – and publicly – made sexist, racist and homophobic comments; they have issued death threats and incited violence against those with whom they do not agree. President Barack Obama himself – the Progressive movement’s most useful puppet – is notoriously thin-skinned and completely unwilling to even engage in a serious discussion with anyone who opposes him politically or ideologically.

The various special interest groups in the US which pretend to fight for nothing more than acceptance, equality and ‘social justice’, such as the LGBT community, the NAACP and amusingly titled Planned Parenthood are, in fact, pushing for far more than mere equality; they are campaigning forcefully to impose their views upon everyone. Whilst the American political Right is more and more influenced by the Libertarian philosophy of Don’t Tread on Me, the political Left has become an alarmingly authoritarian movement; a veritable SS panzer division, ready to crush all those who oppose it and round up the survivors for re-education – or extermination.

Case in point: A private citizen with their own business – a bakery – refuses to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. Firstly, that should clearly be a matter of the individual in question making a decision based upon their personal values and principles. The same-sex couple in question could merely have taken their business elsewhere. However, they were so filled with hatred and intolerance for anyone who refuses to conform to their beliefs that they stimulated – no pun intended – a campaign that lead to the afore-mentioned small business owner shutting down the business. Which party was the least tolerant, here? Which, the greater believer in ‘diversity’? The baker did not start a campaign to prevent the couple getting married, they simply declined to be connected with that marriage. The same-sex couple, by contrast, was determined to ruin a business – and quite prepared to destroy a life – because they came across someone who did not share their values.

Are those same-sex partners believers in diversity? Clearly not, or they would have brushed off the baker’s refusal to co-operate with a shrug and gone elsewhere for their cake; they would have accepted the fact that ‘diversity’ extends also to opinion and to values. The couple in question have every right to marry, if they are living in a state that permits same-sex marriage. The federal government has no constitutional right to deny their wishes; other private citizens may disapprove, but have no right to prevent their marriage – other than through the state-level ballot-box. Members of the LGBT community – or, as Al Sharpton calls them, homos – have a right to expect tolerance and freedom from persecution; they have no right to force everyone else to accept their lifestyle as normal.

Aside from the fundamentalists of the so-called Christian Right – America’s very own version of the Muslim Brotherhood – nobody else on the political Right wishes to force gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender individuals to give up whatever lifestyle they have chosen. One has the right, however, to disapprove of whatever one wishes. The moment any group forces its will upon others and hounds, threatens, ridicules, demonizes – and discriminates against – anyone who happens to hold a different set of values, then that group has, itself, become the standard for intolerance, hatred and bigotry.

Diversity is, by definition, a complete acceptance of – and, indeed, a complete disregard for – differences of faith, lifestyle, skin-color, principle and belief. One simply cannot claim to embrace diversity whilst, at the same time, declare that anyone who holds a different opinion should be silenced, excluded and even punished.

The LGBT community – so long as it remains complicit in the drive to eliminate all dissent – is nothing more than a willing tool – no pun intended, again – of a Progressive movement that promotes a grotesque parody of ‘diversity’ which is, in reality, a form of fascism.

An op/ed by Graham J Noble

7 Responses to "LGBT Activists and the Fascism of Diversity"

  1. James   October 9, 2013 at 6:17 pm

    you do not have to approve someone else’s life style to make him a cake. it’s business, I don’t think that the writer of this article understands what diversity is. so you want to see gay bakery or gay cafes around. I think this causes polarization, bigger conflicts in the future. if someone doesn’t want to make business with you just because of your sexual orientation, that doesn’t seem to me that that person supports diversity. without toleration there cannot be diversity. making a wedding cake is not a moral decision. it’s not your wedding cake or those people are not asking you to be a gay like them. I didn’t see any verses in the Bible about ”not to make wedding cake for gay couples”.

    • Graham Noble   October 9, 2013 at 6:49 pm

      Firstly, I did not claim that the business owner in question supports diversity.

      It is you who does not seem to understand diversity. Ultimately, diversity means people of different lifestyles, faiths and races living together in one society without any of them forcing their beliefs on others. The cake-maker was not attempting to force anything; they merely choose not to participate in something with which they did not agree. This cake-maker, as a business owner, has every right to chose not to do business with whomever they wish, for whatever reason they wish. Additionally, the same-sex couple were perfectly able to go elsewhere for their wedding cake.

      That should have been the end of it, but now a private citizen has had to close their business because someone else did not like a decision that they had every right to make.

      It doesn’t say anything in the Bible about being forced to associate with, or do business with, those with whom you do not agree.

      I would add that, although I personally do not approve of same-sex marriage, I would have baked them the cake.

      The gay community uses boycotts all the time to attempt to intimidate businesses into conforming to their wishes. When the cake-maker refused to bake a cake for a gay couple, weren’t they, in effect, merely employing the same tacitc and ‘boycotting’ the wedding?

      Why is it acceptable for one side to choose who they will and will not do business with, but not acceptable for the other side to do the same?

      I am sorry to say, Sir, that your own failure to use logic has defeated you.

      Best wishes,


  2. B Newie   October 2, 2013 at 12:17 am

    The LGBT terrorist’s are the biggest fascist’s out there! They militantly attack and discriminate against anyone who shares an alternate view. Chic-fill-a or the Christian Worldview anyone? Apparently they are not allowed to hold their age old beliefs anymore.

  3. Karen   September 30, 2013 at 7:55 pm

    Excellent and amusing! Can’t wait for the SNL skit…

    • Graham Noble   September 30, 2013 at 7:57 pm

      Don’t hold your breath

  4. Graham Noble   September 30, 2013 at 7:47 pm

    Thank you! I’m glad you liked it.


  5. Amy Whatley   September 30, 2013 at 7:15 pm

    Amazing article. Thank you.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.