State Troopers Violently Beat Deaf Man for Not Hearing [video]

Officers beat deaf man because he could not hear their ordersAllegedly an Oklahoma City deaf man was viciously beaten for not hearing State Trooper’s order. Officers beat Pearl Pearson for approximately seven minutes when he pulled over what he thought would be a typical traffic stop.

The 64-year-old  diabetic, who is also deaf, assumed when the officers pulled him over that they would immediately request identification. As soon as Pearson rolled down his window he was met with a punch in face. Not just once but the officers continued to use excessive force against him as they accused him of not obeying their commands.

The fact of Pearson’s hearing deficiency is clearly displayed on his vehicle and on his driver’s license.

Allegedly Pearson was pulled over because earlier he fled the scene of an accident. Not only was accused of resisting two officers, but according to an affidavit Pearson didn’t comply with repeated orders to show his hands after he was pulled over.

Pearson who obviously could not hear what the officers were saying to him was attempting to show his identification but said he was hit in the face instead. He was arrested and later charged for resisting arrest and leaving the scene of an accident. The affidavit did not state whether or not the officers knew that Pearson could not hear their orders. However, it does state that a physical altercation ensued for about seven minutes.

Even though Pearson had a placard which reads, “Driver is deaf” on his driver’s door an interpreter was never provided for him. Reportedly Pearson repeatedly requested an interpreter but he never received one, not during his arrest or time in jail.

Pearson said at the time he didn’t know why he was being arrested and still doesn’t understand why he was beaten so viciously.

Pearson may be deaf but he’s no stranger to the proper way to respond when he’s pulled over by law enforcement; his own son is a police officer. His son-in-law who is now a deputy sheriff was, of course, a police officer at one time as well. Pearson always believed that law enforcement was meant to serve and protect.

Spokesman for the Oklahoma Highway Patrol (OHP), Captain George Brown, said after an internal review of the facts surrounding Pearson’s arrest, Col. Rick Adams, Chief of Patrol, has ordered that the investigation expand their focus in order to see if any violations of the state law occurred. If investigators find that there were violations of the state law or department policy appropriate action will be taken.

As of today no outside complaint regarding this incident had been received by the office of the chief. Also at this time State Troopers Kelton Hayes and Eric Foster remain suspended with pay, pending the outcome of this investigation.

According to Billy Coyle, Pearson’s attorney, his client is completely innocent of the allegations. He says his client is profoundly deaf and was only attempting to give the officers his specialty license when he was attacked.

Sacia Law, Pearson’s neighbor, said Pearson is a kind man and what happened to him had to be the result to a misunderstanding. She said “Officers have dangerous jobs where they put their lives on the line continuously but they can’t yell at Pearson from behind his car and expect a response because his hearing is impaired.” Law said she believes their actions were over the top.

Allegedly on January 3 Pearl Pearson, an Oklahoma City deaf man, was viciously beaten by OHP for not obeying orders that he could not hear. Officers beat the deaf man for approximately seven minutes when he pulled over what he believed to be a simple traffic stop.



By: Cherese Jackson (Virginia)


News One
Huffington Post
Fox 4

4 Responses to "State Troopers Violently Beat Deaf Man for Not Hearing [video]"

  1. Close Call   February 9, 2014 at 9:28 am

    What is the time limit for a police report to be filed in this alleged hit and run accident
    or for that matter the arrest of the gentlemen that was abused. The longer time lapses
    the more clouded / tainted the report becomes. I haven’t seen any ink in any OKC city
    newspaper, and I did look in the archives of the Oklahoman paper. Something happened in WoWtown, Texas (Ft. Worth) that smells badly, it’s called (CTA) covering their arse.
    (Just search engine) 29 May, 2013, 72 year old man shot in his garage in Ft. Worth,Tx.
    This case went to a Grand Jury, they no-bill the police shooter. They went to the wrong address, but the part that smells is it took a long time for all this to get to a result. Time
    to cloud, and/or taint the truth. Protect who? Serve who? Read the news reports it
    smells. The family now with be in a civil suit with the city, the taxpayers will foot the bill.
    Folks across this country need to wake up, this kind of thing is happening everywhere.

  2. Scott   January 19, 2014 at 9:37 am

    Mr. Pearson should consider using COMMERCIAL LIENS against the property of the two troopers that did this to him. Make them hurt financially until they make a public apology and pay for his medical bills and restitution for pain, suffering and lost time. Check for info on these very potent liens.

  3. Deaf Deaf   January 17, 2014 at 5:27 pm

    Please be advised that the term, “hearing impaired” is unacceptable. Here is the explanation:

    The term “Hearing Impaired” is a technically accurate term much preferred by hearing people, largely because they view it as politically correct. In the mainstream society, to boldly state one’s disability (e.g., deaf, blind, etc.) is somewhat rude and impolite. To their way of thinking, it is far better to soften the harsh reality by using the word “impaired” along with “visual”, “hearing”, and so on. “Hearing-impaired” is a well-meaning word that is much-resented by deaf and hard of hearing people. This term was popular in the 70s and 80s, however, now is used mostly by doctors, audiologists and other people who are mainly interested in our ears “not working.”

    While it’s true that their hearing is not perfect, that doesn’t make them impaired as people. Most would prefer to be called Deaf, Hard of Hearing or deaf when the need arises to refer to their hearing status, but not as a primary way to identify them as people (where their hearing status is not significant).

    We are deaf, and not people with impairments (obstacles) in life!

    Hope that you and your people respect by refusing to use the outdated and offensive term. Hearing loss is more acceptable for everyone who is not just deaf.

    • Cherese Jackson   January 18, 2014 at 8:33 am

      Thank you so much for your comment and clarity on hearing impaired vs. deaf. The term has only been used here where is was quoted by the neighbor. Thanks again for taking the time to share such great insight and for reading. I appreciate both.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.