World War I and the Monarchist Resurgence in Europe

World War I will be remembered again on June 28th. On that day, Europeans will gather in the poppy fields of France to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the beginning of the Great War that claimed the lives of millions of men in the blood-soaked fields of the Somme, Verdun, Gallipoli and a hundred other battlefields. The conflict saw the end to the entrenched and autocratic monarchies of Germany and Austria-Hungary. In particular, victory in the Great War by the Allied powers saw an end to the great imperial dynasty of the Austrian Habsburgs who were stripped of all power and exiled from their country. Monarchists throughout Europe have since that day longed for the resurgence of royalty in Europe.

For the new Austrian monarchist party, the Schwarz-Gelbe Allianz, June 28th is a day to commemorate the lost heir to the Habsburg line, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, whose assassination that day in Sarajevo by a Serbian nationalist sparked World War I and doomed the imperial family. The platform of the right-wing Austrian political group, named after the black and yellow of the Habsburg imperial crest, is no less than the creation of a constitutional monarchy in Austria under Karl von Habsburg (b. 1961). The group also seeks to reclaim imperial dignities to the house of Habsburg and resurrect the  imperial subject states in Central Europe. Many Europeans who watch their colorful parades scratch their heads at this new monarchist resurgence.

Monarchist parties are not new on the modern European political scene. The UK Royalist Party, the French Nouvelle Action Royaliste, and the Italia Reale – Stella e Corona have been active in European political circles since after the Second World War. Many of the monarchist movements in Europe are characterized by conservative anti-American, anti-EU and anti-liberal beliefs. In terms of economic beliefs, they resemble American libertarians. Most are founded on conservative ideas of Christian heritage and supremacy, hyper-nationalism and anti-pluralism, which puts them in the company of other European far-right nationalist groups, as well as the American religious right. Their unique platform of monarchical restoration puts them on the extreme fringe.

For monarchists such as the Schwarz-Gelbe Allianz, founded in 2004, commemorations of World War I are a time of special importance. The era saw the last real political and military power of European monarchies but also the last dominance of Christian nationalism represented by the Habsburg dynasty. The recent resurgence of splinter monarchist groups and ultra-nationalist displays of European monarchism parallels the resurgence of right-wing political activism that has been gaining ground in Europe since the 1990s. Many members of once-royal families who are active in European politics have distanced themselves from the far right-wing views of monarchist political groups.

The grandfather of many of the modern continental monarchist movements in Europe is the French royalist group, Action Française, which was founded in 1899 by the ultra-Catholic nationalist Charles Maurras. In his writings, which he published regularly in a publication of the same name as his organization, he denounced parliamentarism and pluralism. He also argued for the return to France of a Catholic constitutional monarchy which could eliminate Jewish and foreign influence in French affairs.

Maurras backed France’s entry into World War I against Germany. His group allied itself with the fascist Vichy government of France during the Second World War. After the war, French royalists split from the fascist Action Française and formed their own groups. Among them were Nouvelle Action Royaliste, and the more recently established Centre royaliste d’Action Française (1998), Alliance Royale (2001) and Rassamblement Démocrate (2004). Many French royalists still hold onto Maurras’ views, while others distance themselves from his racism and anti-Semitism. All French royalists hold onto the ideas of constitutional monarchy which he espoused. Currently, French monarchists are split between Prince Jean Carl d’Orléans (b. 1965) and Louis Alphonse, Duke of Anjou (b. 1974) as claimant to the throne of France.

After the Second World War, Italian monarchists also split from associations with Fascism, forming the Italian Monarchist Union in 1946. The Monarchist Union eventually splintered into several groups, among them Italia Reale – Stella e Corona which formed in 1972. Their platform is the return of a constitutional monarchy to Italy under the House of Savoy, whose current claimant is Prince Amedeo of Savoy (b. 1943). Monarchist societies are found in most European countries, including Spain and the Netherlands.

Will constitutional monarchies be reintroduced into Europe? Not a chance. Turning the political clock back a hundred years, erasing all constitutional gains and protections Europeans have struggled for in the last century, and erecting a Christian empire under a Catholic imperial monarch would require a revolution and war of such magnitude that modern European countries would cease to exist. Such revolutions are discussed in monarchist Internet forums, but the dreams of such sweeping and violent political change lie far outside the meager political capabilities of such extremist groups.

For now, commemoration of the long-dead Archduke Ferdinand and the end of his imperial dynasty after World War I is all that is left to the Austrian monarchists. The resurgence of monarchist groups in Europe reflects only the growing discontent with the European Union by right-wing nationalist parties. The recent gains by the right-wing in French and British parliaments suggest that fringe beliefs such as monarchism will be around for a while longer in Europe.

By Steve Killings

Austrian Independent
Los Angeles Times
The Jerusalem Post

5 Responses to "World War I and the Monarchist Resurgence in Europe"

  1. rdhenkerDr. Raymond Henker   March 4, 2017 at 10:57 am

    Despite all of the endless propaganda against the institution of monarchy since the end of the First World War, the fact remains that the so-called “modernism” and “post-modernism” of the 20th and 21st century has introduced artificial systems based upon the rights of man to such an extent as to foster unauthenticity, lack of cultural identity, and crass social ambivalence and selfishness. The democracies around the world have proven to be extremely corrupt and inefficient, and also culpable of many heinous crimes without equal. Their hypocrisy is astounding. Monarchy lasted hundreds of years due to its cultural stability, not force of arms. It is a natural, organic development which is successful; and as the world overpopulates, the democracies will have to forgo their ideological stance on mass immigration and human rights and will have to think about the preservation of society…….I am NOT referring to any racism, but rather the sustaining of vivid cultures and expression around the world. Once monarchy as an institution is removed, the world is full of extreme fanatics both right and left. The answer (not for all nations mind you) is a semi-absolutist monarchy in which power is shared by the King, Parliament, and Judiciary…..the King/Queen and his/her cabinet have limited powers as does the other branches of government. The King/Queen has to share in the responsibility of governing and must not be reduced to an elitist, foppish fool with no duties except to live in decadent luxury – the British monarchy is a disgrace and should not be repeated..

  2. Austin Pomper   February 14, 2016 at 12:51 pm

    You speak only of the people that wish to put the Monarchs in place not of the Royals themselves. Many royals are very liberal even today. Creating constitutional monarchies in Europe would not destroy what Europeans have sought to achieve, in some cases it would make it better. Think of the Hapsburg Dynasty, the only reason Hitler was able to conquer most of Europe was because of the fall of the Hapsburg’s. The empire disintigrating created a lot of small states that can barely protect themselves even today. And who were the people Hitler first attacked and took over, the states left over from the Austrian Empire. Monarchy brings people together, it unites diverse people. Where as republican ideas and countries divide everyone and keep them separated through political means even when it comes to the heads of their countries. Constitutional monarchy is a great thing and is something which drives many modern countries who have plenty of freedoms and who’s people are very happy. Countries like the UK, Sweden, Denmark, Japan, The Netherlands, Spain. Next time you decide to write an essay on monarchy, make sure you get everyone’s side of the story, not just inflating republics and denouncing monarchy.

  3. The Christian Monarchist   July 13, 2014 at 6:55 pm

    I agree with the first guy’s comment. I myself am a die-hard monarchist and I honestly believe that the restoration of Monarchy in Europe can have a major effect on the world as we know it today. After all, the fall of a monarchy does not make things better for a nation. The French Revolution brought the Reign of Terror, the Russian Revolution resulted in the Soviet Union which brought widespread oppression not just in Russia, but around the world (not to mention the deaths of millions), and the German Revolution made it so much easier for Adolf Hitler to come to power. If these monarchies were never overthrown, a lot of tyranny that was afflicted around the world would have been very much avoided. RESTORE THE MONARCHY!!!!!!

  4. Tertium Antilles   June 29, 2014 at 5:30 pm

    Um no. Reintroduction of constitutional monarchy into Europe does not require any violent revolution or war at all even though most monarchies were overthrown through violent undemocratic means. Modern European republics could have their own royal families once again without any change to modern border. Even for the Habsburg Empire, its successor states could just form a loose federation or just accept the Habsburgs as the imperial/royal family in the form of personal union like the Commonwealth Realm.

  5. Arion of Eleutheria   June 29, 2014 at 2:06 am

    In your haste to characterize all the “right-wing” activity, you forgot about the third “entrenched and autocratic” monarchy that fell: Russia.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.