NASA Conspiracy in Antarctica



NASA had made news this week with its release of data about the Antarctica ice shelf. According to the agency the Larson B shelf located in Antarctica is shrinking fast, more quickly than scientist previously thought. This info has caused alarm among global warming communities, with predictions of the ice shelf completely disintegrating in the next few years, causing sea levels to rice. Another study though release by the agency earlier this month seems to call into question those findings, could NASA be involved in a conspiracy when it comes to the Antarctica?

The data released in May shows that polar sea ice has actually increase by about five percent above the 1979 average. The base line for measuring ice caps is 1979, the year that satellites started to keep track.

The co-author of the latest study being question by some is Eric Rignot, a glaciologist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, he said the study of the Antarctic Peninsula glaciers gives information about how ice shelves farther south that hold much more land ice will be effected by a warming climate. Rignot did not comment on whether he believes the warming is due to natural causes or to man.

Those who believe that man is the cause of global warming are known to make predictions that are apocalyptic in nature, and with help from media, and a large percentage of scientist, have most governments on board. The UN has almost 200 countries agreeing to negotiate a pact by the end of 2015 to fight global warming. Their Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has said that there is a 95 percent chance of warming due to man-made actions such as the burning of fossil fuels. Opponents of man-made global warming believe that the UN and federal agencies are using catastrophic events such as floods, droughts, and severe storms to further their agenda of stricter environmental regulations to bring an end the worlds industrial based economy. Opponents point to what they consider a large amount of evidence that shows that man is not responsible for the changes in the Earth’s climate. The United Kingdom’s National Whether Service know as the MET office released a report that says warming of the planet stopped 15 years ago in 1997. University of Pennsylvania Professor Dr. J. Scott Armstrong who is considered an expert in forecasting wrote: “No one has provided evidence to refute our claim that there are no scientific forecasts to support global warming.”.

With a report released by NASA this month showing that there has been improvement in the polar ice caps it has some opponents claiming that NASA is conspiring about Antarctica with global warming communities to push the UN’s agenda. NASA’s mission has been known to change based on whom is in office, with President Obama who is a supporter of government intervention when it comes to climate change many are not surprised by NASA’s latest apocalyptic prediction.

The debate about global warming and climate change will continue to rage, those who are neither alarmist or deniers and are unsure of the exact extent that man impacts the climate can only be dissuaded when data is manipulated in order to prove a theory one way or the other. The scientific community needs to have an honest debate and not shut out any who disagrees with the consensus that global warming is indeed exasperated by mankind. When opponents are silenced and ridiculed it only fuels those that believe there is a vast conspiracy between government and global warming communities to use climate change as a way to control the population and the economy. NASA has always be a favorite target of conspiracy theorist, from aliens, the moon landing, doomsday prediction, and now claims of ignoring their own observations to promote an agenda when it comes to the ice in Antarctica,  for those that have made up their minds either way it is doubtful that this latest accusation will change the minds of many.

Opinion by Jessica Hamel


Conspiracies: Fact or Fiction: NASA’s Own Data Discredits its Predictions of Antarctic Doom

The Telegraph: The Fiddling With Temperature Data Is The Biggest Science Scandal Ever

The Daily Sheeple: New NASA Report Reveals Ice Caps Are Not Melting

Photo Courtesy of Kimberly Vardeman’s Flickr Page-Creative Commons License


10 thoughts on “NASA Conspiracy in Antarctica

  1. wh0cd1758607 [url=]diflucan 150 mg tablets[/url] [url=]kamagra now[/url] [url=]drug finasteride[/url] [url=]amitriptyline online[/url]

  2. This is really interesting, You are a very skilled blogger. I have joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your excellent post. Also, I have shared your website in my social networks!

  3. You made certain good points there. I did a search on the theme and found mainly people will go along with with your blog.

  4. A debate by people qualified by training and practical experience to have an opinion and who have actually been feet on the ground doing research would be a good idea.
    Might have difficulty finding many on the Sceptic/denier side

    However when permanent land ice is taken into account, the loss is huge.
    The models actually predicted sea ice growth in Antarctica due to increased calving and land ice loss, fresh water has a higher freezing point and forms an insulating layer due to density differences.
    Meanwhile the pool of cold water from the Greenland glacier melt in the Atlantic is affecting the Atlantic conveyor which is arguably the oceans pulse and has a great influence on Europe’s weather.
    This years maximum Arctic sea ice was well down with much thin ice, record melt since satellites and the written record. Keep an eye on it as there is expected to be strong warm winds from the US and Siberia, Siberia is another story , record warmth for several years now.
    Look up the JAXA (Japanese official aerospace site) “Sea ice extent ” for the Arctic- NOTE DECADAL AVERAGES

  5. Unfortunate that the media does not understand the difference between “Land Ice” and “Sea Ice”.

  6. Despite the headline no refutation of any science put forth by NASA. None. I was looking for an evidence based article. Simply citing those who hold a different opinion is not an argument.
    Jessica, learn to make an argument.

  7. please go learn the differences between ice shelves and sea ice before commenting further. the two are completely different in morphology, in the processes that form them and those that destroy them, and, most importantly, the implications that their loss would have on sea level are completely different

  8. Destroying What Remains
    As the race heats up for reserves of oil and gas in the melting Arctic that shouldn’t be extracted and burned in the first place, so do the Navy’s war games. From southern California to Alaska, if you live in a coastal town or city, odds are that the Navy is coming your way, if it’s not already there.

    Paying for Air Pollution and Global Warming
    Fossil Fuel Subsidies Total Trillions of Dollars Per Year
    Most of the cost of fossil fuels is hidden because environmental harms such as pollution and global warming are kept outside ordinary economic calculation. Energy companies externalize these costs (among others) — that is, they don’t pay them. The public does.
    And we do, to a remarkable extent. When we think of corporate subsidies, we naturally think of taxes not paid, real estate giveaways and other ways of taking money from the public and shoveling it into corporate coffers. Then there are the environmental costs, something prominent if we are talking about fossil fuels. These, too, should be thought of as subsidies since these constitute costs paid by the public. A first attempt at seriously quantifying the magnitude of the totality of subsidies given to fossil fuels leads to a conclusion that the total for 2014 was US$5.6 trillion, a total expected to be matched in 2015.

Comments are closed.