Women – Especially Lesbians- Are Shallow Money Sucking Beasts Says President of Marriage Policy

Women -especially lesbians - are money sucking beasts says President of marriage policy
Just a few days before Women’s Equality Day, the President of the Center for Marriage Policy, David R. Usher, made a very bold statement, accusing women, especially lesbians, of being shallow, money-sucking beasts who desire to enslave men.  His article in Renew America on August 21 has triggered a landslide of reactions from many people, including the LGBTQ community, wondering which dense brain cell he could have pulled his theories out of.

According to David Usher, same sex marriages (especially between women), if allowed to spread across the nation, will spur a mass enslavement of men.  How will this occur?  Apparently, lesbian women are primed to get themselves pregnant outside of their partnership by unsuspecting straight and even gay males, who they will then demand child-support from, raping the tax-payers to support their “sinful” lifestyle.  He even goes so far as to suggest that single mothers would marry each other in order to collect double child-support and cause an economic slavery to occur for heterosexual men everywhere.  Wow.  It seems that women are nothing more than shallow, money-sucking beasts who don’t give a darn about love, emotional support and true happiness; we just want your money.

Usher accuses women of entrapping men by getting pregnant and then not giving the men anything in return, demanding economic support: “Most women will bear children by men outside the marriage – often by pretending they are using birth control when they are not. Entrapped men become economically-conscripted third parties to these marriages, but get nothing in return,”  he said. Speaking of women-to-women relationships, did he really say “most women?”  Wow, talk about lumping people into one crude category.  There is no bias here, obviously.

He goes on to say Today, approximately 25% of single mothers cohabit with an undocumented boyfriend. Same-sex marriage allows women to double-up on everything, establishing sub-rosa polyandrous marriage as a common legal institution with men as peripheral servants without a stake in marriage or society.”  Wow. Women, do we do this?  We are evil, treating men as the servant while we enjoy the “easy life” of mothering while marrying our girlfriends for added financial benefits.  Hmmm.

David Usher goes on to classify marriages into three categories: Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3.  The first class, as already mentioned, is the mother-t0-mother marriage – which, according to him, has the greatest government aided financial benefits.  Let’s not forget that these types of marriages are not yet legal in every state, so his petition against them comes from a deep fear of what it might mean to see two women come together in holy matrimony. The horror!

The second class of marriage is the “traditional” male-female heterosexual marriage, for which he argues “Children of these marriages are almost always born of the marriage and supported by husband and wife without governmental involvement.”  Looking at statistics, in 1990 married couples with children made up 60% of the increase in poverty, landing them on welfare.  In 2011, the poverty rate was at 15%, 10% of which was from married couple families.  True, the numbers for single parent homes are greater, though saying heterosexual marriages are “almost always supported without governmental involvement” might be a stretch.

The third class of marriages is the male-male gay marriage, who Usher says are the most disadvantaged.  This may be true due to unpopularity by the straight population alone, but his reasons completely come out of left field.  Apparently, gay men who marry each other are doubly at risk for being financially screwed by the shallow, money-sucking beasts known as women, who will lure these gay men into having sex with them, get pregnant and then demand child support from them.  Remember, these are gay men we are talking about.  Men who don’t want to have sex with women, which is why they are termed “gay.” So, these “tricked” gay men are now going to pay double child-support to the lesbian or “mock-lesbian” women who will use their marriages to gain financial control and enslave men.  Interesting theory, David Usher.  Do you have any mama issues you would like to get out of your system before condemning women everywhere for our shallow, money-sucking evil tendencies?

On this day of women’s equality, I would like to personally question Mr. David Usher on his theory and ask him which women he knows who would prefer to use men for their money than to live as a loving, nurturing, decent human being seeking companionship and joy?  According to the President of the Center for Marriage Policy, David Usher, women, especially lesbians, are shallow, money-sucking beasts who are more interested in financial gain than in true love.  What do we have to say about this ladies? Or is it even worth a further comment?

The way I see it – the rise of the divine feminine is so powerful today that men who are insecure in who they are and the relationship they have to their own inner feminine will want to run for cover or point an accusing finger.  Not to worry though, the Mother-of-all is kind and loving.  This man obviously needs to be taken into the arms of another and assured that he too is loved.  Perhaps he desperately needs to feel the love of a woman, or maybe he too needs to admit a deeper issue of acceptance gone wrong.  Whatever it is, let’s be women about it and love him anyway.


Written by: Stasia Bliss

Source 1
Source 2

4 Responses to "Women – Especially Lesbians- Are Shallow Money Sucking Beasts Says President of Marriage Policy"

  1. Loka   October 25, 2016 at 5:08 pm

    Where is that pictuere from?
    Movie? Tv serwis?

  2. Vanessa Blanchard   August 27, 2013 at 9:42 am

    I love this article! Thank you for calling that joker out. Seriously. There are two parts of his statement that I love the most 1) that all lesbian and gay couples are secretly straight and will trick each other into heterosexual relations for financial gain, and 2) that women view men as chattel, brood mares, what have you. Talk about transference and sweeping generalizations!

    Sarcasm aside, thank you for returning a voice of reason into this conversation.

  3. P I T A   August 27, 2013 at 8:45 am

    this is funny.
    so fictitious that there is actually truth in there.

    offense is generally taken when some deep insecurities
    are struck. people need tons of therapy… but therapists
    are people too. so ironic life is…

  4. LosMortales   August 26, 2013 at 4:31 pm

    Child abuse is always bad. Sometimes, the legal system is worse.
    People v. Leiby: A Documentary—Jury Verdict Reversed With Directions To Acquit—Insufficient evidence of Child Abuse


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.