Quantum Mechanics Proves an Afterlife Through ‘Biocentrism’ Says Scientist

Quantum mechanicsQuantum mechanics and other rules of quantum physics prove that there is an afterlife, according to scientist Robert Lanza. Lanza is a physicist who recently proposed the theory of “biocentrism.” This theory states that humans are eternal beings who have created the concept of life and death with our own consciousnesses and that death actually does not exist; we only think it exists because it’s what we have collectively come to believe. Humans create the universe with our consciousness, not the other way around, Lanza says.

To illustrate his theory of an afterlife, Lanza uses the famous and well-known “double slit experiment.” This test proves that all matter can act as a wave, and as such can exist simultaneously in multiple places, but is only perceived to be a singular unit of movement when it is watched by humans. In other words, only our consciousness-our perception-makes the particle behave like a linear object. When the particle is not watched by the human eye, it acts like a wave and passes through multiple slits simultaneously.

This experiment, Lanza says, is the key to our understanding of how our consciousness creates what we perceive to be reality. In this way, his theory is parallel to the theoretical idea of multiverses. There are some theoretical physicists who believe that we exist not just in one universe, but in a possibly infinite number of multiple universes; and that everything that could possibly happen-every scenario that could possibly be imagined-is happening simultaneously in another universe starring us; we just don’t know it.

Lanza says we create everything around us and that death is simply an illusion that we have also created. He says that each person is a “perennial flower that returns to bloom in the multiverse,” and that “Life is an adventure that transcends our ordinary linear way of thinking. When we die, we do so not in the random billiard-ball-matrix but in the inescapable-life-matrix.” This happens, he adds, through the theory of biocentrism and the workings of quantum mechanics. Lanza has written a book about his findings entitled Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness Are the Keys to Understanding the True Nature of the Universe.

Lanza’s ideas, however, have been soundly debunked and rejected by numerous scientists as a misunderstanding of actual quantum mechanics and the laws of quantum physics. In a blog post entitled Biocentrism Demystified: A Response to Deepak Chopra and Robert Lanza’s Notion of a Conscious Universe, scientist and writer Vinod Wadhawan debunks both Lanza and the self-proclaimed “guru” Deepak Chopra, who holds similar views to Lanza, thusly:

-Space and time exist, even though they are relative and not absolute.

-Modern quantum theory, long after the now-discredited Copenhagen interpretation, is consistent with the idea of an objective universe that exists without a conscious observer.

-Lanza and Chopra misunderstand and misuse the anthropic principle.

-The biocentrism approach does not provide any new information about the nature of consciousness, and relies on ignoring recent advances in understanding consciousness from a scientific perspective.

-Both authors show thinly-veiled disdain for Darwin, while not actually addressing his science in the article. Chopra has demonstrated his utter ignorance of evolution multiple times.

Wadhawan’s post is extremely thorough in describing the actual quantum mechanics and rules of quantum physics and how they don’t add up to prove Lanza’s theories correct. Additionally, mainstream science rejects those who do not understand Darwin’s theory of evolution. This theory is generally understood and accepted by the scientific community.

Quantum mechanics proves an afterlife through “biocentrism” says scientist Lanza, but his views are regarded as “pseudo-science” by the larger community of researchers.

By: Rebecca Savastio

Daily Mail

Times of India

The Independent

Nirmukta Blog

21 Responses to "Quantum Mechanics Proves an Afterlife Through ‘Biocentrism’ Says Scientist"

  1. Baishakhi Sur   March 18, 2018 at 4:51 am

    What’s Say Neuroscience..The Marcopolo Of Neuroscience-Dr.V.S.Ramacharchan Lectures On Embodied Souls In You Tube From University Of California,Berkely and Where Is The Human Being’s ‘Self’ and When A Person Dies His Life Is Completely Finised Then Where Is The Significance Of ‘Self’ In The Universe..Neuroscience Says ‘Self’ and The Significance Of ‘Self’ Are Difficult To Answer..So,Neuroscience Is Freething On Explaning The Nature Of The ‘Self’ As It’s Neither Theist,Agnostic Or Atheist On Explaning The Nature Of The ‘Self’…

  2. bettyroundhead   December 6, 2015 at 8:38 pm

    Well if Einstein was right and their is no reality, only the illusion of a reality, then I guess any illusion of reality is real to that person betty roundhead quantum metaphysicist

  3. Josh Levin   June 8, 2015 at 10:11 pm

    Oh the irony….. The pseudoscience is when scientists believe that there is an actual materialistic universe out there that isn’t just comprised of information. Obviously it’s scientific fact that our brain takes information out there and makes sense of it. Where is the “woo woo” now?

  4. jj   May 31, 2014 at 2:05 pm

    Yes, there is an after life. Read the Quran.

  5. Reenie   January 11, 2014 at 1:27 pm

    Note to the author: Robert Lanza is NOT a physicist. He is an MD and a scientist in the study of stem cell research.

  6. Yoruichi   December 18, 2013 at 11:41 pm

    @ Mike:- Yes you are right in thinking that way that ‘whatever beliefs we hold is creating reality….. we are actually creating how the universe ticks.’
    Think about the implications!!

  7. mike   December 18, 2013 at 6:23 am

    hmmm, just a little devils advocate here, if the universe is being generated by the combined consciousness of sentient beings, doesn’t it follow then that we would be making the rules? so eventually whatever theories we hold may eventually become the reality, what we think we are discovering thru science may actually be us creating or altering the very fabric of our universe. our whole scientific establishment may not be discovering what makes the universe tick but actually creating how the universe ticks!! 🙂

    • marbles   February 12, 2017 at 2:56 am

      if you listen to the successful people from history and the people of today, most of them got their way by trusting in the universe and having a positive outlook on their goals.
      jim carrey once claimed to have ” just believed he already had what he wanted” and he got every single thing he wanted. he wrote a check for a certain amount of money, and got it. our consciousnesses are the very existence of everything, so whatever we want to make happen, we can do it.
      i got my house, car, job, and savings this way.
      ive had days where it seemed cars just all moved out of my lane during a whole trip to the beach making a straight ride when barely any stops.
      watch “the secret” on netflix for a basic explanation. after i watched that. i studied biocentrism, , pantheism, and the Fibonacci sequence. the universe has the answers, and you are the universe. success can be as simple as happiness or peace. “buddhist scriptures speak of hundreds of billions of world systems, and consciousness existing since beginningless of time” – the dalai lama

  8. Yoruichi   December 13, 2013 at 8:42 am

    This takes us miles closer to the reality! So very glad!!!!
    Totally support Robert Lanza’s theory!

  9. jesus   December 9, 2013 at 3:41 pm

    why are all you nerds so angry?

    • Bubbette Canuck   December 17, 2013 at 2:07 pm

      Us “nerds” are actually a wide collection of people with almost nothing in common other than an interest in the world: science, philosophy, etc. And, we don’t all share an emotional condition (anger). We’re actually individuals, and as far as I can tell, not particularly “angry”. BUT, i have two related questions: why would you feel the need to call everyone on here “nerds”? And, what exactly do you see in my post (below) that indicates anger?

You must be logged in to post a comment Login