Newsweek Back in Print Again With Very Different Owners


Newsweek, one of the most venerable names in news magazine history, is back in print again after a two-year hiatus. The long-time liberal nemesis of conservative arch-rival Time Magazine, went to a digital-only format in December, 2012 in a last-ditch effort to save the brand. That experiment was declared a failure by the end of 2013.

When that did not work, Barry Diller, the media mogul who had inherited control over Newsweek from his late friend Sidney Harman, sold the news magazine to IBT Media, a tiny digital only publisher, with strong conservative Christian ties.

The new Newsweek came out swinging with its first issue on March 2, now on newsstands, with a blockbuster scoop about breaking through the wall of secrecy to reveal the identity of super-secretive Bitcoin founder Satoshi Nakamoto to be none other than…Satoshi Nakamoto

That scoop notwithstanding, the new Newsweek has a tough job ahead establishing itself as a respected journal in the face of concerns about the editorial direction the new owners might take. With a more conservative bias in its editorial content, the publication may find it difficult to attract back its old liberal audience…or attract more conservative readers to an old liberal brand.

News-Week” was founded in 1933 by Thomas C.J. Martyn, a former Time Magazine editor, with blue chip backing from the Cheney, Whitney and Mellon families. The magazine merged with Today, another weekly journal, in 1937, which brought Averell Harriman and Vincent Astor into the paper as investors. Astor became the chairman of the board until his death in 1959. Harriman had the unique distinction of running for the presidency on the Democratic ticket twice, and losing to the same man, Dwight David Eisenhower, twice.

Despite its celebrity-studded board of directors, Newsweek (as the magazine became known from 1937 on) was always second-fiddle to the more successful Time Magazine. Its greatest journalistic accomplishment was probably its coverage of the Watergate Scandal, logical since Newsweek was very much a bastion of the Democratic Party offsetting Time Magazine’s decidedly more conservative bias. Its most notorious setbacks were probably the cover photos showing former Republican presidential aspirant Michele Bachmann and Vice President candidate Sarah Palin in unflattering poses. There were also allegations of plagiarism against several reporters.

Last issue before Diller pulled the plug on the printed edition

Newsweek was bought out by The Washington Post Company in 1961. After years of declining subscriptions and advertising revenues, Newsweek moved away from hard news coverage, focusing instead on opinion and commentary. Continuing mismanagement lead to an operating loss of $29.3 million in 2009, up from a $16 million loss in 2008.

The Washington Post, itself in financial straits, was unable to continue carrying Newsweek’s losses and sold the magazine to Harman-Kardon co-founder Sidney Harman in 2010. His $1 bid was taken over four others, including one from Syrian entrepreneur Abulsalam Haykal and a group of Middle Eastern investors. Harman agreed to pick up the magazine’s liabilities as part of the deal. (Harman was married to Jane Harman, former California Congresswoman and currently head of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, a Democratic party think-tank.)

When Harman died in 2011 at the age of 92, Newsweek became Barry Diller’s problem. Diller had gone into partnership with Harman, both of whom had strong ties to the Democratic Party, to save the magazine. After Harman passed away, Diller put Newsweek into a joint venture with The Daily Beast, hoping that Daily Beast owner Tina Brown could help revitalize the Newsweek brand.

When that failed to work, Diller sold the magazine, then only in digital form, to IBT Media, which now publishes 10 online publications, including such titles as International Business Daily and Medical Daily. Co-owners Etienne Uzac and Johnathan Davis founded their company in 2006, using only their own personal funds. Revenues were reported at $21 million for 2013. Both men have held executive positions at Olivet University founded by controversial evangelical pastor David J. Jang but there is no evidence that Jang has any direct involvement in the firm.

The cover of the new Newsweek’s first edition after coming back to the newsstands.

A resurrected Newsweek might be considered good news for the beleaguered US publishing industry but the new Newsweek is being published as a luxury item, according to Bloomberg/Business Week. A quick cost comparison calls that judgment into question. The new Newsweek wants $140 annually for the print edition and just $40 annually for the digital-only access,but that may not be much of a luxury. The digital-only version of the New York Times costs $195 a year. The annual cost for the printed version of the daily editions of the New York Times cost $2.50 a day, or $782.50 per year. The New York Times Sunday edition costs $5 per week or $260 a year. Compared to those prices, the new Newsweek is a bargain. News is expensive.

The new Newsweek has started off with a bang, with the cover story on its maiden issue about the “discovery” of the identity of “Satoshi Nakamoto,” the man credited with creating the Bitcoin phenomenon. In a copyrighted article, Newsweek reporter Leah McGrath Goodman identifies the mysterious Nakamoto with another Satoshi Nakamoto, creating a firestorm of controversy over whether or not he is the same man, and whether Goodman had any right to “out” him. The story has ignited a great deal of conversation and recrimination on the internet, which is exactly what a new publication wants today: buzz.

The story of Goodman’s coverage of the Nakamoto story is the story inside the story, and that is the kind of thing that journalists are schooled to avoid. “Cover the story, but do not become the story” is the rule that most journalists  try to follow but, sometimes, reporters can not avoid becoming part of the story and this is one of those occasions.

Newsweek may be back in print with very different owners but, when it comes to making a splash with their first issue, their cover story did the trick. Newsweek is back.


By Alan M. Milner


Ad Age
New York Times
Bloomberg/Business Week

7 Responses to "Newsweek Back in Print Again With Very Different Owners"

  1. Sheree Ferlenda   March 11, 2019 at 7:45 am

    I have been browsing on-line more than 3 hours today, but I never found any fascinating article like yours. It is lovely price enough for me. In my opinion, if all web owners and bloggers made good content material as you did, the net will be much more useful than ever before.

  2. Teena Kinsel   March 8, 2019 at 11:34 pm

    Howdy! This is kind of off topic but I need some help from an established blog. Is it very hard to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick. I’m thinking about making my own but I’m not sure where to start. Do you have any tips or suggestions? Thank you

  3. Alva Covarrubias   February 27, 2019 at 12:10 pm

    Sweet web site, super style and design, real clean and apply genial.

  4. Jon Doh   March 18, 2015 at 6:12 am

    Was a long time subscriber to the old Newsweek. As much as I loved the old magazine and am glad to see the name back in print, I have no interest in subscribing to a “Christian Conservative” magazine. Fox News slants the truth enough.

  5. Pattie O'Donnell   August 8, 2014 at 7:42 am

    Glad to find this information before re-subscribing. We enjoyed the old Newsweek, but not really interested in a conservative Christian slant on the news – there are plenty of options out there if we want that.

  6. bap   March 7, 2014 at 3:10 pm

    I have been waiting for this news…surprised to find this on the Time website but having problems finding it on Google. Is the Guardian the only one carrying the story? Why is site listed on old phone line so strange… is it a gag? How to get a subscription? BAPl

  7. James Fahnestock   March 7, 2014 at 2:00 pm

    It was Adlai Stevenson, not Averill Harriman, who twice lost to Dwight Eisenhower. Harriman lost the Democratic nomination to Stevenson in 1952 and 1956.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.