Election Results for Obama show a Disturbing Trend [See Video]

Election Results analysis of the Obama Victory over Mitt Romney show a disturbing trend of potential cheating and other fraud.

By Benjamin Gaul:

Democrats have invested millions of dollars on dozens of lawsuits, demanding that any voter identification laws passed by individual states be repealed. Sadly, we may now know why they filed them. It seems very likely that Democrats needed to steal the vote in certain key states, so that Obama could be reelected. This is not an issue we raise lightly.

Did we just became a Third World country?

No incumbent president in the last 60 years has won reelection with the unemployment rate as high as it currently is. Was the only way left for the Democrats to keep Obama in office, to steal the election? Obama failed to win ANY states with photo ID laws for voters, but he did win all the swing states which do not require voter ID. Organizations like True the Vote offer very convincing arguments that fraud and shenanigans were the rule on Tuesday, November 6th, 2012.

We come to this conclusion due in part to the fact that Obama lost in every state which requires a photo ID be produced and verified, before voting. NONE of those states been found guilty of “voter disenfranchisement” in anything but the Court of Public Opinion, which is controlled and managed by the shaded reporting in the major media.

The list of closely contested “swing” state elections –with no voter ID– whose votes narrowly gave the win to Obama include: Minnesota (10), Iowa (6), Wisconsin (10), Nevada (6), Colorado (9), New Mexico (5) and Pennsylvania (20).

This amounts to a total of 66 electoral votes. When added to Romney’s total of 205 electoral votes, that would give Romney 271 electoral votes, enough votes to win even without Ohio or Florida.

Romney also likely had the states of Florida and Ohio stolen from him, which don’t require photo IDs. Ohio requires a non-photo ID. Would a library card do? Florida “requests” a photo ID, but doesn’t require it. So what happens if they request a photo ID and the illegal alien Haitian doesn’t have one? Do they just count the vote anyway?

Electronic Voting Machines switching Romney votes to Obama votes were too common to be an “electronics glitch.”

Zachary Roth of MSNBC reports that Voting Machines in several states had developed a tendency to cast Romney votes for Obama, and In Greensboro at the Bur-Mil Park, a voter complained that they tried to vote for Mitt Romney three times but that the ballot cast was instead for Barack Obama. Other voters, in some other parts of the state, said they experienced similar issues. Guilford County Register of Deeds George Gilbert said “The machines have to be recalibrated periodically.” He also said that it is very important that voters review their choices before hitting the button. Indeed.

All of this adds up to some VERY hinky hijinks on behalf of the Obama team and their faithful minions in the major media, to say the least.


8 Responses to "Election Results for Obama show a Disturbing Trend [See Video]"

  1. Eliot   November 12, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    “Barack Obama received more than 99% of the vote in more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio on election day. In fact, there were a substantial number of precincts where Mitt Romney got exactly zero votes. So how in the world did this happen? Third world dictators don’t even get 99% of the vote.” Add to that, in at least 10 counties in Colorado, between 104% and 140% of the registered voters voted in counties where Obama won. Obama didn’t win in a single state where a photo ID is required to vote. What does all of this suggest, hmmm? http://marketdailynews.com/2012/11/12/election-fraud-barack-obama-won-more-than-99-percent-of-the-vote-in-more-than-100-ohio-precincts/

  2. Benjamin Gaul   November 9, 2012 at 6:37 pm

    Holy. Crud. THIS Just In:

    Sworn testimony of a man who CREATED the prototype software language which can skew votes whichever way you want them to go, in court today, 11-09-12


  3. Benjamin Gaul   November 9, 2012 at 6:13 pm

    You’re asking fair questions, but they aren’t the RIGHT questions, Saint Braeburn. Romney lost Ohio, a state with 18 electoral college votes, by 103,518 votes out of 5,368,392 cast. 1.9% is a rounding error. An easy number for fraudulent votes to cover.

    Then we read this in the Wall Street Journal:

    “In Columbus, Ohio, poll watchers for True the Vote, a group linked to the Tea Party, were denied access by county officials at precincts around the county.

    True the Vote’s president, Catherine Engelbrecht, called the actions “dangerous and offensive” and denied that volunteers had broken any ethics rules. Ms. Engelbrecht said this was “a final, desperate attempt to deny citizens their right to observe elections.”

    I know the ABC article pointed out an Obama to Romney switch. I could have linked to a dozen other sites which show the Romney to Obama switch in states like Nevada, but ABC is a better cross-link.

    And the Justice Department study of “who got caught” by no means points to how many did NOT get caught.

    Shall we discuss the ACORN malfeasance?

  4. Voter Poll Watcher   November 9, 2012 at 7:12 pm

    Finally, after the election, Guardian is being fair to a right leaning story. I noticed it was in the tank for Obama just like all the other media before the election.

    • Benjamin Gaul   November 20, 2012 at 6:17 pm

      Thanks for commenting, Poll Watcher.

      Please do not mistake my erstwhile and prolific colleague James Turnage to be the Voice of the Guardian Express LV. Our Publisher and Editor, for all that I speak with them daily, have not even let ME know which political party they hail from.

      All I know is that they encourage my work, and are never satisfied that I’ve written enough articles for them, in any given week. They’ve even gone so far as to name ME the paper’s Political Analyst. Even if they’re Liberal, they’re at least rabid Capitalists about this endeavor.

      I’d have produced more copy before the Election, but I was very busy trying to get Conservatives elected.

      Keep an eye on my By Line here in the Guardian. It’s about to get serious.

  5. Saint Braeburn   November 9, 2012 at 3:11 am

    Okay three things:

    1. “Obama lost in every state which requires a photo ID be produced and verified.”

    The problem with this is that (as your map shows) only 4 STATES (Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, and Tennessee) require photo ID.
    What your implying is that Obama lost these states due to them requiring Photo ID, however Kansas,Tennessee, and Georgia are all very red states and everyone expected the Republicans to get them. I mean the last time the Democrats got Kansas was in 1964!

    On the matter of Indiana, while some called it a swing state, most polls and pundits said that it was going to Romney.

    And on top of that if not requiring photo IDs is what won Obama Nevada, Iowa, Wisconsin, Colorado, and all the other swing states you mentioned; then why didn’t it help him win North Carolina, a state with no voter ID laws?

    2.Electronic Voting Machines switching Romney votes to Obama votes were too common to be an “electronics glitch.”

    First of all I’d like to point out that the MSNBC article you linked to, shows actual footage of A voting machine changing a

    Ivote for Obama into a vote for Romney. On top of that I can find you several more cases of incidents like this happening.

    But of course if a Electronic Voting Machine switches a vote from Obama to Romney its a glitch. When the opposite occurs its the result of a national conspiracy.

    3. So what happens if they request a photo ID and the illegal alien Haitian doesn’t have one? Do they just count the vote anyway?

    I’ll be honest, I realize that Voter Fraud exists. But I’ve never been given any statistic that show it is done by so many people that it has any meaningful impact on Presidential Elections. It certainly isn’t done widely enough to be the sole cause of Obama’s victory.

    And lets not forget a major study by the Justice Department between 2002 and 2007 showed that of the 300 million votes cast in that period, federal prosecutors convicted only 86 people for voter fraud – and of those few cases, most involved persons who were simply unaware of their ineligibility.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.